Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think it is ok to benefit from animals, while others think they Should not be exploited.discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think it is ok to benefit from animals, while others think they Should not be exploited. discuss both views and give your opinion aAdbY

There is a heated debate amongst plenty of masses about the fact whether animals should be used to get benefits from them or not. This essay is an attempt of discussing both schools of thought along with an appropriate opinion. On one hand, because of number of reasons animals' using is advantageous. First of all, since the dawn of human civilization, animal are being used in order to get milk, dairy products as well as food. In-brief, till this moment, there is no any supplement of milk and this product can only be driven out from domestic animals. Secondly, certain animals are being used by laboratories for medicine testing that are providing shining benefits to human waste. On the other hand, a lot of people are disfavouring first view point as they believe they are exploting animals and undoubtedly they are true towards their thinking. To start with, on the name of fashion, abundance of animals such as buffaloes, crocodiles and pigs are being killed that is unexceptable. In-addition, who has given rights to perform laboratory on mute souls as they are being exploited during such experiments. Besides this, elephant are tortched heavily in order to get ivory tusks to manufacture bangles. To conclude, after examining the whole topic, i believe we can't survive without animals as it is clear that if animals gone then trees gone and if tress gone than humans gone. As a result, the most powerful creature of the supreme power should not role the roast over speech-less creatures.

There is a heated debate amongst This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
plenty
 of masses about the fact whether You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 benefits from them or not. This essay is an attempt of discussing both schools of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 along with an appropriate opinion. On one hand, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of number of reasons animals' using is advantageous. This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, since the dawn of human civilization, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 are being This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 milk, dairy products as well
 as food. In-brief, till this moment, there is Did you mean "now" (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?now
no
 any supplement of milk and this product can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
be driven
 out from domestic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. Secondly
, certain You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are being This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 by laboratories for medicine testing that are providing shining benefits to human waste. On the other hand
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 are Possible spelling mistake found.disfavoring
disfavouring
first
 view point as they believe they are Possible spelling mistake found.exploringexplodingexploiting
exploting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 and undoubtedly
 they are true towards their thinking. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 with, on the name of fashion, abundance of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 such as buffaloes, crocodiles and pigs are being killed
that is
Possible spelling mistake found.unacceptable
unexceptable
. In-addition, who has This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 rights to perform laboratory on mute souls as they are being exploited
 during such experiments. Besides
 this, elephant are Possible spelling mistake found.torched
tortched
heavily
 in order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 ivory tusks to manufacture bangles. To conclude
, after examining the whole topic, Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.I
i
 believe we can't survive without You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 as it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 gone then trees gone and if tress gone than humans gone. As a result
, the most powerful creature of the supreme power should not role the roast over speech-less creatures. 