Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think it is important to protect all wild animals. Others think that it is only important to protect part of them, not all of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think it is important to protect all wild animals. Others think that it is only important to protect part of them, not all of them. 95yD3

Discord arises when it comes to either all of the wild animals or only part of them should be protected. I will discuss both of the views until an appropriate conclusion can be made. There are several reasons why people believe that all of the wild animals should be preserved. For one thing, they reckon that protection from human beings would raise living standards of animals and the more the preservation is, the better the living quality of animals will be. For another, they believe that how the natural system works is not scientific and quite different from how humans live, so animals are in need of help and preservation to survive The proposal of saving every single wild animal on earth boils down to the fact that there are no wild animals which are not affected by human activities. Because of population expansion and urbanization, every single animal on earth is negatively influenced, they either suffer from a loss of habitat, or reduction in food resources. Their food chain is severely interrupted by human beings. It is rather understandable why some would advocate such an approach.

Discord arises when it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approachesarrives
comes
 to either Consider using "all the".all the
all of the
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 or This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 part of them should be protected
. I will discuss both of the views until an appropriate conclusion can be made
.

There are several reasons why This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that Consider using "all the".all the
all of the
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 should be preserved
. For one thing, they reckon that protection from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings would raise living standards of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 and the more the preservation is, the better the living quality of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 will be. For another, they believe that how the natural system works is not scientific and quite This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 from how You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are in need of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 and preservation to Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphsurvive.survive!survive?survive:survive,survive;
survive


The proposal of saving every single wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 on earth boils down to the fact that there are no wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 which are not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :impacted
affected
 by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 activities. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 of population expansion and urbanization, every single You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 on earth is negatively
 influenced, they either suffer from a loss of habitat, or reduction in food resources. Their food chain is severely
 interrupted by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 beings. It is rather
 understandable why This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 would advocate such an approach. 