A large population in the world is still under the grip of poverty and economic stress. For that reason, it is the responsibility of the charitable institution to support the needy, despite their country or nation. However, few others are of the opinion that the NGOs should consider only their native people. But, I strongly agree with the former view.
To begin with, unemployment and financial instability have caused widespread impoverishment throughout the globe and it is not concentrated on any particular area and this issue cannot be seen with discrimination. Also, there are certain under-developed or developing countries where large scale philanthropic works cannot be undertaken due to financial stress. As a consequence, not all organisations can afford to help their own communities. Hence. they would require outside help. For instance, the WHO (World Health Organisation) has undertaken many charitable activities through the African nation since the country is not self-sufficient. Therefore, it is always suggested to conduct charitable function around the world despite demographic differences.
On the other hand, there is always a possibility for a financial strain on the firm or Trust that conduct worldwide philanthropic activities and in such scenario, it is not viable to share alms to the impoverished within the country. It is due to this reason, a section of speakers oppose charity to cross borders. Furthermore, some organisation fail to recognise their own people who are suffering. For example, in the U. S there are many NGOs and yet the rate of poverty and destitution is at a rise.
In conclusion, in my opinion, the charitable organisation cannot concentrate only on their own native people, and more efforts and work should be put forward to help all the nations to deprive poverty.
A large population in the world is
still
under the grip of poverty and economic
stress
. For that reason, it is the responsibility of the
charitable
institution to support the needy, despite their
country
or nation.
However
, few others are of the opinion that the NGOs should consider
only
their native
people
.
But
, I
strongly
agree
with the former view.
To
begin
with, unemployment and financial instability have caused widespread impoverishment throughout the globe and it is not concentrated on any particular area and this issue cannot be
seen
with discrimination.
Also
, there are certain under-developed or developing
countries
where large scale philanthropic works cannot be undertaken due to financial
stress
. As a consequence, not all
organisations
can afford to
help
their
own
communities.
Hence
.
they
would require outside
help
.
For instance
, the WHO (World Health
Organisation
) has undertaken
many
charitable
activities through the African nation since the
country
is not self-sufficient.
Therefore
, it is always suggested to conduct
charitable
function around the world despite demographic differences.
On the other hand
, there is always a possibility for a financial strain on the firm or Trust that conduct worldwide philanthropic activities and in such scenario, it is not viable to share alms to the impoverished within the
country
. It is due to this reason, a section of speakers
oppose
charity to cross borders.
Furthermore
,
some
organisation
fail to
recognise
their
own
people
who are suffering.
For example
, in the U. S there are
many
NGOs and
yet
the rate of poverty and destitution is at a rise.
In conclusion
, in my opinion, the
charitable
organisation
cannot concentrate
only
on their
own
native
people
, and more efforts and work should
be put
forward to
help
all the nations to deprive poverty.