It is argue that some people could just make as much noise as they prefer. While I have to admit that this perspective is accurate to a somewhat extent. I still hold a notion that there should be stringent controls about loud by specific acts of Government is much more advantageous.
On the one hand, making noise belongs to freedom of speech, which is one of human rights. First of all, freedom of speech is granted by most of international law systems.
Therein, meeting is one of the activities, which cause much loud. Besides, some events very prefer and need much noise such as birthday celebration, singing contest or football match. For instance, in football match, audience should make loud as much as they can in order to raise up players’ fight spirit. At the same time, thanks to the development of science and technology, scientist invented material which can block out the noise.
On the other hand, others who are in favour of it is very necessary to restrict loud have their own justifications. As a matter of fact, noise has exterted an adverse impact on our life. noise could make serious influence for people’s health. Nowadays, noise pollution occurs at many countries specially developing countries which focuses on developing industry. The noise is produced by factories, constructions or vehicles. Living in a place that is too noisy in a long time cause some problems for health such as headaches, sleepless. Apart from this, educational institutions and offices could be effected by loud. students and officer will not be able to pay attention on their lecture or work. For instance, student will not be able to do exercises if his neighbours keep singing too loud.
To recapitulate, I am strongly convinced that although making noise is one of human rights, this ought to restrict so as to protect others rights.
It is
argue
that
some
people
could
just
make
as
much
noise
as they prefer.
While
I
have to
admit that this perspective is accurate to a
somewhat extent
. I
still
hold a notion that there should be stringent controls about
loud
by specific acts of
Government
is
much
more advantageous.
On the one hand, making
noise
belongs to freedom of speech, which is one of human rights.
First of all
, freedom of speech
is granted
by
most of international
law systems.
Therein, meeting is one of the activities, which cause
much
loud
.
Besides
,
some
events
very
prefer and need
much
noise
such as birthday celebration, singing contest or football match.
For instance
, in football match, audience should
make
loud
as
much
as they can in order to raise up players’ fight spirit. At the same time, thanks to the development of science and technology, scientist invented material which can block out the noise.
On the other hand
, others who are in
favour
of it is
very
necessary to restrict
loud
have their
own
justifications. As a matter of fact,
noise
has
exterted
an adverse impact on our life.
noise
could
make
serious influence for
people
’s health. Nowadays,
noise
pollution occurs at
many
countries
specially
developing countries
which focuses on developing industry. The
noise
is produced
by factories, constructions or vehicles. Living in a place
that is
too noisy in a long time cause
some
problems for health such as headaches, sleepless. Apart from this, educational institutions and offices could
be effected
by
loud
.
students
and officer will not be able to pay attention on their lecture or work.
For instance
, student will not be able to do exercises if his
neighbours
keep
singing too loud.
To recapitulate, I am
strongly
convinced that although making
noise
is one of human rights, this ought to restrict
so as to
protect others rights.