Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people they that interview is the best method in recruiting staff but others say there are better ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.2

Some people they that interview is the best method in recruiting staff but others say there are better ways. v. 2
In the modern world of work, interview is arguably the most popular method of selecting employees in the world. Some people even claim that it is also the best way to do the job but others disagree. In my opinion, the nature of the career would decide how suitable interview is in staff selection process. On the one hand, I agree that interview is absolutely necessary in most cases for two compelling reasons. Firstly, this is a perfect chance to employers to know more about their potential staff. Apart from basic information such as academic qualifications or work history that recruiters could find out easily in their candidates' CVs, they would have deeper understanding about the candidates' personalities like openness or motivation in direct communication, which is crucial in deciding who would be the most qualified to the position. Secondly, having a direct talk to the potential employer is normal the only chance for job seekers to show their skills, especially communication ones. Most of the professions nowadays do require workers to communicate one way or another; hence both the interviewers and candidates if they certainly can talk to each other before settling working relationship. On the other hand, I also believe that interview is not necessary in recruiting new staff working in some certain fields like science or computer programming. Obviously, choosing scientists or programmers with excellent communication skills is unrealistic since they mostly do their specialized tasks with full intellectual concentration and without frequent communication to other people. Also, the values of researchers or coders, illustrated in their past projects they have accomplished, appear unequivocally in their CVs, which could be easily acknowledged by the employers within seconds of reading instead of minutes or even hours of interviewing. Therefore, there is no need for employers to talk to potential staff who they have already had enough information to take into the consideration In conclusion, I strongly believe that interview is an effective method of recruiting staff across many occupations, but not in some highly specialized fields like science or computation.
In the modern world of work,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is
arguably
the most popular method of selecting employees in the world.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
even claim that it is
also
the best way to do the job
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
others disagree. In my opinion, the nature of the career would decide how suitable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
selection process.

On the one hand, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is
absolutely
necessary
in most cases
for two compelling reasons.
Firstly
, this is a perfect chance to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
to know more about their potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
. Apart from basic information such as academic qualifications or work history that recruiters could find out
easily
in their
Possible spelling mistake found.
candidates&
#039;
Possible spelling mistake found.
CVs
, they would have deeper understanding about the
Possible spelling mistake found.
candidates&
#039; personalities like openness or motivation in direct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
, which is crucial in deciding who would be the most qualified to the position.
Secondly
, having a direct talk to the potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employer
is normal the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
chance for job seekers to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
,
especially
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
ones. Most of the professions nowadays do require workers to communicate one way or another;
hence
both the interviewers and candidates if they
certainly
can talk to each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
settling working relationship.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, I
also
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not necessary in recruiting new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
working in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
certain fields like science or computer programming.
Obviously
, choosing scientists or programmers with excellent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
is unrealistic since they
mostly
do their specialized tasks with full intellectual concentration and without frequent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
communication
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.
Also
, the values of researchers or coders, illustrated in their past projects they have accomplished, appear
unequivocally
in their
Possible spelling mistake found.
CVs
, which could be
easily
acknowledged by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
within seconds of reading
instead
of minutes or even hours of interviewing.
Therefore
, there is no need for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employers
to talk to potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
who they have already had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
information to take into the consideration

In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is an effective method of recruiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
across
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
occupations,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
highly
specialized fields like science or computation.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes
Learn a new language and get a new soul.
Czech Proverb

IELTS essay Some people they that interview is the best method in recruiting staff but others say there are better ways. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
342 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts