Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people says that companies and people should pay for the waste pollution the produces not the government. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people says that companies and people should pay for the waste pollution the produces not the government. E3783
It cannot be denied that the increasing pollution came from big companies because of the waste product it produces which is then added by people who were not concerned with the environment. Thus, raising the concern that companies and individuals should pay for their acts rather than the government. I definitely agree on this idea but it can be resolved with a compromise. In this essay I will tackle the reasons and give my opinions. To begin, It is appropriate for companies and people to pay for what they are doing with the environment. Waste products brought by these individuals rise the pollution of the country because of the neglect of each and everyone. It is evident that companies are the huge source of these pollution whereas people in the society take part. If these people will become more responsible the pollution would be lessened. However, Not only the government is suffering from this but also the society as a whole. Tourism is less attractive because of these pollutants and with this the income of the country suffers which can be considered as a payment from public officials. This argument being said, This writer believes that these can be solved with a compromise. Government sectors should make a law regarding the proper waste segregation for both companies and people as a whole, if these rules are not followed there should be an appropriate fine for everyone. For example, these rules are applicable now in some countries like in Singapore, they are strict with these guidelines which helps them maintain their environment. In addition, public officials can also step up to make a project with regards to the clean and green act of the community by this not only the people can benefit but also the society. To conclude, Both companies, people and government should put into consideration the welfare of the country thus responsibility of each individual arises with all of them pays back to the society which is needed.
It cannot
be denied
that the increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
came from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the waste product it produces which is then
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
added
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who were not concerned with the environment.
Thus
, raising the concern that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and individuals should pay for their acts
rather
than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
. I definitely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
on this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it can
be resolved
with a compromise. In this essay I will tackle the reasons and give my opinions.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
, It is appropriate for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to pay for what they are doing with the environment. Waste products brought by these individuals rise the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the neglect of each and
Did you mean "every one"?
everyone
. It is evident that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
are the huge source of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
whereas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in the society
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
take part
.
“If” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
If
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will become more responsible the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pollution
would
be lessened
.

However
, Not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
is suffering from this
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
the society as a whole. Tourism is less attractive
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of these pollutants and with this the income of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
suffers which can
be considered
as a payment from public officials.

This argument
being said
, This writer believes that these can
be solved
with a compromise.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Government
sectors should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a law regarding the proper waste segregation for both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
as a whole, if these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
are not followed there should be an appropriate fine for everyone.
For example
, these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
are applicable
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
like in Singapore, they are strict with these guidelines which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
them maintain their environment.
In addition
, public officials can
also
step up to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
a project
Use "in regard to", "with regard to", or more simply "regarding".
with regards to
the clean and green act of the community by this not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can benefit
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
the society.

To conclude
, Both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should put into consideration the welfare of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
thus
responsibility of each individual arises with all of them pays back to the society which
is needed
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people says that companies and people should pay for the waste pollution the produces not the government.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
330 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people says that companies and people should pay for the waste pollution the produces not the government. Do you agree or disagree?