Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion

These days, the problem of the environment is more serious than in the past. Some people think that the main problem is the loss of particular species such as plants and animals while others believe that there are more important environmental problems. Today I would like to talk about both these, and my opinion. Let us talk about the first argument. Some people argue that the loss of particular species of plants and animals is the main problem of the environment. Because More and more species are lost, nature can destroy. For example, If people cut down many trees, the air is polluted. The second reason is that the food chain is confusing. On the other hands, Other people have a view that different problem of the environment is more important than others, sea-level rise and melting of the glacier for instance. Because if, the glacier melt, polar bears and penguins can be lost their habitat. In addition, We cannot live the earth. To sum up, I organised about two discuss. First, some people say that the main environmental problem is the loss of particular species. Becuase, the environment is able to destroy, and also the food chain is confusing. Others people think that there are more important environmental problems, such as the sea-level rise and melting of the glacier. In my opinion, Both views are important. Becuase I think, these connect as the environment.

These days, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 is more serious than in the past. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that the main You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 is the loss of particular species such as plants and animals while others believe that there are more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgreatrelevantnecessaryextensiveinfluentialbig
important
 environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :this day and agenowadays
Today
 I would like to talk about both these, and my opinion.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
Let
 us talk about the first
 argument. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 argue that the loss of particular species of plants and animals is the main You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 More and more species are lost
, nature can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishruin
destroy
. For example
, If You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :minimize
cut
 down This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 trees, the air is polluted
. The second reason is that the food chain is confusing.

On the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 hands, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
Other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 have a view that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 is more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgreatrelevantnecessaryextensiveinfluentialbig
important
 than others, sea-level rise and melting of the glacier for instance
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 if, the glacier melt, polar bears and penguins can be lost
 their habitat. In addition
, We cannot This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 the earth.

To sum up, I Possible spelling mistake. 'organised' is British English.organized
organised
 about two discuss. First
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 say that the main environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 is the loss of particular species. Possible spelling mistake found.Because
Becuase
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 is able to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishruin
destroy
, and also
 the food chain is confusing. Others You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that there are more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgreatrelevantnecessaryextensiveinfluentialbig
important
 environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
, such as the sea-level rise and melting of the glacier. In my opinion, Both views are You use this word too often, consider replacing it withgreatrelevantnecessaryextensiveinfluentialbig
important
. Possible spelling mistake found.Because
Becuase
 I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
, these connect as the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
. 