Nowadays, people have divergent views about whether governments ought to allocate more of their budget to mass transit for all citizens complimentary. I generally agree with this viewpoint, as a focus on public transit will be an essential component of environmental sustainability.
The principal reason many people have a positive attitude towards free public transportation is that it saves a lot of money. Firstly, public shipment can ease the issue of the traffic jam which is caused by the growth of private vehicles. Commuters and residents would see no need to drive their cars if there is a free and convenient service that takes them from places to places. Because, public transportation has fully stated-funded, another advantage of using it is that commuters can reduce their transit costs and living expenses. Secondly, the demand for public shipping for all citizens is surging rapidly due to using fewer private cars saves the environment and people’s health as well. It causes less air pollution because the carbon dioxide released by cars is decreased. As all people know that carbon dioxide can harm people’s health, if less carbon dioxide released to the environment, people do not have to breath polluted air inevitably.
On the other hand, even if country administrations can get behind a project, they often have trouble mobilizing public money, whether through taxation or by borrowing. These are indeed big infrastructure projects that are needed to be built, and it requires astronomical cost. For instance, in Tokyo, the most recent and in-progress light-rails cost more than $100 million per mile in 1990. Thus, it is unrealistic for the government to introduce public transportation to people completely free.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the use of free public shipment should be encouraged by the government so that we can save extra money, health and the environment. However, we also should consider how the government will raise that capital.
Nowadays,
people
have divergent views about whether
governments
ought to allocate more of their budget to mass transit for all citizens complimentary. I
generally
agree
with this viewpoint, as a focus on
public
transit will be an essential component of environmental sustainability.
The principal reason
many
people
have a
positive
attitude towards free
public
transportation is that it saves
a lot of
money.
Firstly
,
public
shipment can
ease
the issue of the traffic jam which
is caused
by the growth of private vehicles. Commuters and residents would
see
no need to drive their cars if there is a free and convenient service that takes them from places to places.
Because
,
public
transportation has
fully
stated-funded, another advantage of using it is that commuters can
reduce
their transit costs and living expenses.
Secondly
, the demand for
public
shipping for all citizens is surging
rapidly
due to using fewer private cars saves the environment and
people’s
health
as well
. It causes less air pollution
because
the carbon dioxide released by cars
is decreased
. As all
people
know that carbon dioxide can harm
people’s
health, if less carbon dioxide released to the environment,
people
do not
have to
breath polluted air
inevitably
.
On the other hand
, even if country administrations can
get
behind a project, they
often
have trouble mobilizing
public
money, whether through taxation or by borrowing. These are
indeed
big
infrastructure projects that
are needed
to
be built
, and it requires astronomical cost.
For instance
, in Tokyo, the most recent and in-progress light-rails cost more than $100 million per mile in 1990.
Thus
, it is unrealistic for the
government
to introduce
public
transportation to
people
completely free.
Overall
, it is crystal
clear
that the
use
of free
public
shipment should
be encouraged
by the
government
so
that we can save extra money, health and the environment.
However
, we
also
should consider how the
government
will raise that capital.