Some people believe that the state should be responsible on what kind of treatment children should receive. However, others feel parents are the ones to decide for their children.
To begin with, the state should decide on what type of treatment children should receive. The reason behind this is for a fact that the state is aware of all genuine medical facilities as it regulates them. Therefore, it will recommend the ones entitled to provide services accordingly with certified and accredited health care providers. For example, a child requires to be seen by a specialist, the state has a record of accredited ones hence the child receives the best medical care. It is unlikely for parents as they are not aware of all accredited facilities.
Furthermore, the state networks with other countries. There are international conferences annually like global AIDS conferences. As a result, countries share common problems encountered to seek help from others. Following this, they might come up with referral agreements to countries which are able to deal with certain medical challenges. For instance, Botswana refers some of its cancer patients for chemotherapy to South Africa as per agreement. This elucidates why the state should be liable for children’s treatment instead of parents.
In contrary, parents should decide on what kind of treatment their children should get. Alternative medicine has proven to produce results quickly than conventional medicine. For example, parents with an obese child might opt for gastric by –pass in order for their child to lose weight as fast as possible. So if it was to be decided by the state, it would refer to physical fitness instructors and dieticians which would take a while. That being out clarifies why parents should decide on the treatment their children should get. Moreover, they will satisfied that they were in-charge of their children‘s health.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that the state being in control of the treatment that children should receive is fairly clear. However, I assert that both the state and parents should take part.
Some
people
believe that the
state
should be responsible on what kind of
treatment
children
should
receive
.
However
, others feel
parents
are the
ones
to
decide
for their children.
To
begin
with, the
state
should
decide
on what type of
treatment
children
should
receive
. The reason behind this is for a fact that the
state
is aware of all genuine medical facilities as it regulates them.
Therefore
, it will recommend the
ones
entitled to provide services
accordingly
with certified and accredited health care providers.
For example
, a
child
requires to be
seen
by a specialist, the
state
has a record of accredited
ones
hence
the
child
receives
the best medical care. It is unlikely for
parents
as they are not aware of all accredited facilities.
Furthermore
, the
state
networks with other countries. There are international conferences
annually
like global AIDS conferences.
As a result
, countries share common problems encountered to seek
help
from others. Following this, they might
come
up with referral agreements to countries which are able to deal with certain medical challenges.
For instance
, Botswana refers
some
of its cancer patients for chemotherapy to South Africa as per agreement. This elucidates why the
state
should be liable for
children’s
treatment
instead
of parents.
In contrary,
parents
should
decide
on what kind of
treatment
their
children
should
get
. Alternative medicine has proven to produce results
quickly
than conventional medicine.
For example
,
parents
with an obese
child
might opt for gastric by –pass in order for their
child
to lose weight as
fast
as possible.
So
if it was to
be decided
by the
state
, it would refer to physical fitness instructors and
dieticians
which would take a while. That being out clarifies why
parents
should
decide
on the
treatment
their
children
should
get
.
Moreover
, they will
satisfied
that they were in-charge of their
children‘s
health.
In conclusion
, it is worth noting that the
state
being in control of the
treatment
that
children
should
receive
is
fairly
clear
.
However
, I assert that both the
state
and
parents
should
take part
.