Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people say that it is acceptable to test medicine intended for people on animals. Others, however, believe that it is not right to use animals in this research.

Some people say that it is acceptable to test medicine intended for people on animals. Others, however, believe that it is not right to use animals in this research. Nmo9j
Many believe that using animals for scientific testing purposes is fundamentally immoral, while others see it as a necessary evil. In my opinion, even though it is decidedly unethical, the overall impact on human progress justifies its continuance. Detractors of animal testing often point out that animals have rights. We would never condone this type of testing on a human, even with one with a low IQ and it follows that we should treat animals with some measure of respect. The strongest argument supporting this is the level of cruelty involved in animal testing. Many drugs that are tested on animals have painful side effects and the test subjects may die slow painful deaths. This is undeniably unjustifiable regarding testing in non-essential medical fields such as cosmetics. Despite the moral quagmire detailed above, I believe animal testing does enough to advance medical testing to warrant its use. Some cursory research will reveal the importance of animal testing in fields such as diabetic medicine, cancer research, experimental surgery, and stem cells. Testing insulin for diabetics on dogs may be the most well-known example of this kind of impactful research. Many other advances in medicine often attributed to animal testing have saved countless human lives to an extent that would be impossible if researchers were working under the moral constraints of human test subjects. In conclusion, animal testing is the best way to make breakthroughs in medicine and should be strongly encouraged. Governments should work with medical institutions to implement more medical testing on animals across the board
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
believe that using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
purposes is
fundamentally
immoral, while others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
it as a necessary evil. In my opinion,
even though
it is
decidedly
unethical, the
overall
impact on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
progress justifies its continuance.

Detractors of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
point out that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
have rights. We would never condone this type of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
on a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
, even with one with a low IQ and it follows that we should treat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
measure of respect. The strongest argument supporting this is the level of cruelty involved in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
drugs that are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
have painful side effects and the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
subjects may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
slow painful deaths. This is
undeniably
unjustifiable regarding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
in non-essential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
fields such as cosmetics. Despite the moral quagmire detailed above, I believe
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
does
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
to advance
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
to warrant its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
cursory research will reveal the importance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
in fields such as diabetic medicine, cancer research, experimental surgery, and stem cells.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Testing
insulin for diabetics on dogs may be the most well-known example of this kind of impactful research.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
other advances in medicine
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
attributed to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
have saved countless
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
to an extent that would be impossible if researchers were working under the moral constraints of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
subjects.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is the best way to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
breakthroughs in medicine and should be
strongly
encouraged.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Governments
should work with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
institutions to implement more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
across the
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
board
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people say that it is acceptable to test medicine intended for people on animals. Others, however, believe that it is not right to use animals in this research.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
255 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts