Hosting sports events is always an advangeous for the host nations. Some people concur that, if any country
host any events then it can cause problems for the local community while others, believes that it is not
true. This essay will discuss both sides of argument in details and provide as to why holding sports
competitions is good for nations growth.
On the first side of the argument, hosting events brings out the tourists in order to cherish their team.
Additionally, host governement try to rebuilt their historical buildings so, that tourists can visit that places too. In this way host government can enhance their economy and spent this amount in the development of nation. Moreover, if host nation construct new buildings like hotels and bridges at the time of event, then it is beneficial for local people. As an example, Delhi Metro, Hotels, stadiums and Bridges all were constructed during the international games and today, it gives huge beneficts to the locality.
On the opposite side, others, believes that if any nation host any sports events then, it can cause problems for the for the local peoples. During the events there is a huge rush of peoples and vehicles on the road and then it is difficult for the police officers to maintain the law and order. Furthermore, some people also believes that tourists may damage the historical buildings and when they leave the nation, then governement have to spent huge amount of money in the maintenance. For an instance, According to Indian News, 100 million dollars spent by the Indian governement in order to maintain the beauty of Taj Mehal which was damaged during the cricket world cup.
According to my opinion, merits of hosting events outweight its demerits for the host nation. In order to, raise the economy and get name and fame in whole globe each nation should host sports competitions. 
Hosting sports  
events
 is always an  
advangeous
 for the  
host
  nations
.  
Some
  people
 concur that, if any country
host any  
events
 then it can cause problems for the local community while others, believes that it is  
not
 true
. This essay will discuss both sides of argument in  
details
 and provide as to why holding  
sports
 competitions
  is
  good
 for  
nations
 growth.
On the  
first
 side of the argument, hosting  
events
 brings out the tourists in  
order
 to cherish their team. 
Additionally
,  
host
  governement
 try to  
rebuilt
 their historical buildings  
so
, that tourists can visit that places too. In this way  
host
  government
 can enhance their economy and spent this amount in the development of  
nation
.  
Moreover
, if  
host
  nation
 construct new buildings like hotels and bridges at the time of  
event
, then it is beneficial for local  
people
. As an example, Delhi Metro, Hotels, stadiums and Bridges all  
were constructed
 during the international games and  
today
, it gives huge  
beneficts
 to the locality.
On the opposite side, others, believes that if any  
nation
  host
 any sports  
events
 then, it can cause problems  
for the for the
 local  
peoples
. During the  
events
 there is a huge rush of  
peoples
 and vehicles on the road and then it is difficult for the police officers to maintain the law and  
order
.  
Furthermore
,  
some
  people
  also
 believes that tourists may damage the historical buildings and when they  
leave
 the  
nation
, then  
governement
  have to
 spent huge amount of money in the maintenance. For an instance, According to Indian News, 100 million dollars spent by the Indian  
governement
 in  
order
 to maintain the beauty of  
Taj
  Mehal
 which  
was damaged
 during the cricket world cup.
According to my opinion, merits of hosting  
events
  outweight
 its demerits for the  
host
  nation
. In  
order
 to, raise the economy and  
get
 name and fame in whole globe each  
nation
 should  
host
 sports competitions.