Hosting sports events is always an advangeous for the host nations. Some people concur that, if any country
host any events then it can cause problems for the local community while others, believes that it is not
true. This essay will discuss both sides of argument in details and provide as to why holding sports
competitions is good for nations growth.
On the first side of the argument, hosting events brings out the tourists in order to cherish their team.
Additionally, host governement try to rebuilt their historical buildings so, that tourists can visit that places too. In this way host government can enhance their economy and spent this amount in the development of nation. Moreover, if host nation construct new buildings like hotels and bridges at the time of event, then it is beneficial for local people. As an example, Delhi Metro, Hotels, stadiums and Bridges all were constructed during the international games and today, it gives huge beneficts to the locality.
On the opposite side, others, believes that if any nation host any sports events then, it can cause problems for the for the local peoples. During the events there is a huge rush of peoples and vehicles on the road and then it is difficult for the police officers to maintain the law and order. Furthermore, some people also believes that tourists may damage the historical buildings and when they leave the nation, then governement have to spent huge amount of money in the maintenance. For an instance, According to Indian News, 100 million dollars spent by the Indian governement in order to maintain the beauty of Taj Mehal which was damaged during the cricket world cup.
According to my opinion, merits of hosting events outweight its demerits for the host nation. In order to, raise the economy and get name and fame in whole globe each nation should host sports competitions.
Hosting sports
events
is always an
advangeous
for the
host
nations
.
Some
people
concur that, if any country
host any
events
then it can cause problems for the local community while others, believes that it is
not
true
. This essay will discuss both sides of argument in
details
and provide as to why holding
sports
competitions
is
good
for
nations
growth.
On the
first
side of the argument, hosting
events
brings out the tourists in
order
to cherish their team.
Additionally
,
host
governement
try to
rebuilt
their historical buildings
so
, that tourists can visit that places too. In this way
host
government
can enhance their economy and spent this amount in the development of
nation
.
Moreover
, if
host
nation
construct new buildings like hotels and bridges at the time of
event
, then it is beneficial for local
people
. As an example, Delhi Metro, Hotels, stadiums and Bridges all
were constructed
during the international games and
today
, it gives huge
beneficts
to the locality.
On the opposite side, others, believes that if any
nation
host
any sports
events
then, it can cause problems
for the for the
local
peoples
. During the
events
there is a huge rush of
peoples
and vehicles on the road and then it is difficult for the police officers to maintain the law and
order
.
Furthermore
,
some
people
also
believes that tourists may damage the historical buildings and when they
leave
the
nation
, then
governement
have to
spent huge amount of money in the maintenance. For an instance, According to Indian News, 100 million dollars spent by the Indian
governement
in
order
to maintain the beauty of
Taj
Mehal
which
was damaged
during the cricket world cup.
According to my opinion, merits of hosting
events
outweight
its demerits for the
host
nation
. In
order
to, raise the economy and
get
name and fame in whole globe each
nation
should
host
sports competitions.