Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people say that history is not important and necessary anymore. Others say that we must know about the past to understand the future. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people say that history is not important and necessary anymore. Others say that we must know about the past to understand the future. 3gjm5
In the present age, the importance of history has sparked much debate. Some people assert that it is worthless to learn history whereas many others argue that having a grasp of history is beneficial for the future. From my perspective, I am in favor of the latter view. Convincing argument can be made that understanding history has plenty of merits. To start with, when we have a deep understanding about the history of a country, particularly how previous generations fought for freedom, we might respect peace and the lives in the present day. In other words, we always feel satisfied and grateful for what we have and have a tendency to devote our effort for greater achievements. This leads to the full development of the national economy and society. Moreover, people can learn a lot from the mistakes in the past to make life better in the future. For example, in the years of the twentieth century, there were numerous countries imposing the laws of limiting trade across boundaries. These legislations impede the development of the economy and worsen diplomatic relations among nations. Instead of that, governments these days introduce trade policies and encourage export and import, which not only offer countries the opportunities to specialize and innovate but also give citizens a higher standard of living. Admittedly, we do not need to spend too much time on history. The reason for this is that people should focus on the present moment rather than look back and regret about the past things. It might be said that everything changes continually, life now is vastly different from one one hundred or one thousand years ago from concept to behaviour. Even so, history is valuable to understand to a certain extent. In conclusion, while I would concede that sometimes it is useless to invest a large amount of time on history, I am convinced that having history knowledge is more advantageous and crucial for the future.
In the present age, the importance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
has sparked much debate.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
assert that it is worthless to learn
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
whereas
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
others argue that having a grasp of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
is beneficial for the future. From my perspective, I am in favor of the latter view.

Convincing argument can
be made
that understanding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plenty
of merits. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
with, when we have a deep understanding about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
of a country,
particularly
how previous generations fought for freedom, we might respect peace and the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
in the present day.
In other words
, we always feel satisfied and grateful for what we have and have a tendency to devote our effort for greater achievements. This leads to the full development of the national economy and society.
Moreover
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
can learn a lot from the mistakes in the past to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
life better in the future.
For example
, in the years of the twentieth century, there were numerous countries imposing the laws of limiting trade across boundaries. These
Possible spelling mistake found.
legislations
impede the development of the economy and worsen diplomatic relations among nations.
Instead
of that,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
these days introduce trade policies and encourage export and import, which not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
offer countries the opportunities to specialize and innovate
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
give citizens a higher standard of living.

Admittedly
, we do not need to spend too much time on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
.
The reason for this is
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
should focus on the present moment
rather
than look back and regret about the past things. It might
be said
that everything
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
continually
, life
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
is
vastly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
from
Possible typo: you repeated a word
one one
hundred or one thousand years ago from concept to
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
. Even
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
is valuable to understand to a certain extent.

In conclusion
, while I would concede that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
it is useless to invest a large amount of time on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
, I
am convinced
that having
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
history
knowledge is more advantageous and crucial for the future.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people say that history is not important and necessary anymore. Others say that we must know about the past to understand the future.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
324 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people say that history is not important and necessary anymore. Others say that we must know about the past to understand the future. Discuss both views and give your opinion.