Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

some people say that everything

some people say that everything PkkAp
The number of nuclear power stations have significantly risen during the last few decades. This trend demonstrates the growing popularity of this source, which looks promising in our eternal struggle for affordable and unlimited energy. However, there are some undeniable drawbacks to nuclear energy causing disasters we cannot ignore. Thus, I partly agree with the idea that nuclear power is a more reliable solution to the international need for energy than other sources of energy. It is indisputable that nuclear energy is highly stable which indicates that the energy generated is non-stop. Moreover, the amount of energy is tremendous, estimated to be ten times denser than the energy released whilst burning fossil fuels. One nuclear plant's ability to provide a quarter of New York City electricity is iron-cast evidence of the case. In addition, nuclear power reactors do not produce any carbon emissions, which is an enormous advantage over renewable energy having bad effects on animals and their habitats. Producing atomic energy is not only carbon-low but also relatively cheap, which can get even lower thanks to the advances in technology. Nevertheless, the disadvantages are also considerable in this day and age. However safe it may seem, nuclear power can create a disaster if it explodes. The Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine in which the death toll exceeded 60, 000 strongly exemplifies the idea. Nuclear power can also have a substantial impact on the environment through mining and water discharge. Although the operation cost is affordable, the initial one to get a nuclear plant into work is very expensive. Moreover, radioactive waste can leave a persistent impact on the environment for even a thousand years. Despite being an environment-friendly source of energy, nuclear power is still considered a non-renewable one. If we get reliant on it, there might be even more problems in the future. In short, nuclear power has its downsides and benefits like other sources of energy. It is up to us whether the power is good or bad.
The number of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
stations have
significantly
risen during the last few decades. This trend demonstrates the growing popularity of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
, which looks promising in our eternal struggle for affordable and unlimited
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
However
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
undeniable drawbacks to nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
causing disasters we cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ignore
.
Thus
, I partly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
is a more reliable solution to the international need for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
than other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of energy.

It is indisputable that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is
highly
stable which indicates that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
generated is non-
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stop
.
Moreover
, the amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is tremendous, estimated to be ten times denser than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
released whilst burning fossil fuels. One nuclear plant's ability to provide a quarter of New York City electricity is iron-cast evidence of the case.
In addition
, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
reactors do not produce any carbon emissions, which is an enormous advantage over renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
having
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bad
effects on animals and their habitats. Producing atomic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
carbon-low
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
relatively
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cheap
, which can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
even lower thanks to the advances in technology.

Nevertheless
, the disadvantages are
also
considerable in this day and age.
However
safe it may seem, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
can create a disaster if it explodes. The Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine in which the death toll exceeded 60, 000
strongly
exemplifies the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
. Nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
can
also
have a substantial impact on the environment through mining and water discharge. Although the operation cost is affordable, the initial one to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a nuclear plant into work is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
expensive.
Moreover
, radioactive waste can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
a persistent impact on the environment for even a thousand years. Despite being an environment-friendly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
is
still
considered a non-renewable one. If we
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
reliant on it, there might be even more problems in the future.

In short, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
has its downsides and benefits like other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. It is up to us whether the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bad
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay some people say that everything

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
330 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts