Some people may believe that it is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving animals
Some people may believe that it is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving animals JLDMB
Life has been changing dramatically in many areas for a while. Some of these changes, to be more specific inland expantion, brought some damage to faunal life in a way that some animals are endangered. Some people may believe that it is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving animals, while others may disagree. It depends on the lens through which one is looking. From my lens, I agree with the statement, and I feel this way because of two reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To start with, the huge increase in human population. With this continuous increase in human numbers, for sure there will be need to more land, farms, or factories to satisfay the need of this increase. Any need that does not meet, could lead to more serious problems. For instant, in Jordan, there are vast number of people, who are living in a very small country. They try to solve this problem by increase the building lengh, makes the size of the houses smaller so they can utilize the land more. They even try to build the factories far a way, which by the way increase the prices of the product due to the high cost of transportation. On the other hand, there is a big land left empty because it is a natural place for endangered animals. In this case, the humans who live on unhealthy condition are the one who need saving. From this we can see that land is not always available for human to reserve it for animals even if they are in danger.
Secodly, human could do both. Lets say that people have used the whole land for there expantion, why not build a big bulding with several floors that imitate the natural habitat for these endangered animals or move these animals to empty spot far a way from needed land and fix it to meet the animal needs. For example, when I came here to USA, I was amaized by the Zoo, when I visited it before a year. It is a big place that contain what animal could need. In the same patern, human can create a building, or far a way land, and equibs it with the servival tools that could help the endangered animals. It might be win-win situation, which the human could utilize the land he needed, and the animals stay safe. This shows that it is not necessary that if human use the land for his needs, this would harm endangered animal. There are always other solutions.
To sum up, use the land for human needs could have it cons, but using these lands by human may safe him, and also it could be done without harming the endangered animals.
Life has been changing
dramatically
in
many
areas for a while.
Some
of these
changes
, to be more specific inland
expantion
, brought
some
damage to
faunal
life in a way that
some
animals
are
endangered
.
Some
people
may believe that it is more
important
to
use
the
land
for
human
needs
like farms,
houses
, and factories than for saving
animals
, while others may disagree. It depends on the lens through which one is looking. From my lens, I
agree
with the statement, and I feel this way
because
of two reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To
start
with, the huge
increase
in
human
population. With this continuous
increase
in
human
numbers, for sure there will be
need
to more
land
, farms, or factories to
satisfay
the
need
of this
increase
. Any
need
that does not
meet
, could lead to more serious problems. For instant, in Jordan, there are vast number of
people
, who are living in a
very
small
country. They try to solve this problem by
increase
the building
lengh
,
makes
the size of the
houses
smaller
so
they can utilize the
land
more. They even try to build the factories far a way, which by the way
increase
the prices of the product due to the high cost of transportation.
On the other hand
, there is a
big
land
left
empty
because
it is a natural place for
endangered
animals
.
In this case
, the
humans
who
live
on unhealthy condition are the one who
need
saving. From this we can
see
that
land
is not always available for
human
to reserve it for
animals
even if they are in
danger
.
Secodly
,
human
could do both.
Lets
say that
people
have
used
the whole
land
for there
expantion
, why not build a
big
bulding
with several floors that imitate the natural habitat for these
endangered
animals
or
move
these
animals
to empty spot far a way from needed
land
and
fix
it to
meet
the
animal
needs
.
For example
, when I came here
to USA
, I was
amaized
by the Zoo, when I visited it
before
a year. It is a
big
place that contain what
animal
could
need
. In the same
patern
,
human
can create a building, or far a way
land
, and
equibs
it with the
servival
tools that could
help
the
endangered
animals
. It might be win-win situation, which the
human
could utilize the
land
he needed, and the
animals
stay safe. This
shows
that it is not necessary that if
human
use
the
land
for his
needs
, this would harm
endangered
animal
. There are always other solutions.
To sum up,
use
the
land
for
human
needs
could have it cons,
but
using these
lands
by
human
may
safe
him, and
also
it could
be done
without harming the
endangered
animals
.