Some people may believe that it is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving animals
Some people may believe that it is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving animals JLDMB
Life has been changing dramatically in many areas for a while. Some of these changes, to be more specific inland expantion, brought some damage to faunal life in a way that some animals are endangered. Some people may believe that it is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving animals, while others may disagree. It depends on the lens through which one is looking. From my lens, I agree with the statement, and I feel this way because of two reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To start with, the huge increase in human population. With this continuous increase in human numbers, for sure there will be need to more land, farms, or factories to satisfay the need of this increase. Any need that does not meet, could lead to more serious problems. For instant, in Jordan, there are vast number of people, who are living in a very small country. They try to solve this problem by increase the building lengh, makes the size of the houses smaller so they can utilize the land more. They even try to build the factories far a way, which by the way increase the prices of the product due to the high cost of transportation. On the other hand, there is a big land left empty because it is a natural place for endangered animals. In this case, the humans who live on unhealthy condition are the one who need saving. From this we can see that land is not always available for human to reserve it for animals even if they are in danger.
Secodly, human could do both. Lets say that people have used the whole land for there expantion, why not build a big bulding with several floors that imitate the natural habitat for these endangered animals or move these animals to empty spot far a way from needed land and fix it to meet the animal needs. For example, when I came here to USA, I was amaized by the Zoo, when I visited it before a year. It is a big place that contain what animal could need. In the same patern, human can create a building, or far a way land, and equibs it with the servival tools that could help the endangered animals. It might be win-win situation, which the human could utilize the land he needed, and the animals stay safe. This shows that it is not necessary that if human use the land for his needs, this would harm endangered animal. There are always other solutions.
To sum up, use the land for human needs could have it cons, but using these lands by human may safe him, and also it could be done without harming the endangered animals. 
Life has been changing  
dramatically
 in  
many
 areas for a while.  
Some
 of these  
changes
, to be more specific inland  
expantion
, brought  
some
 damage to  
faunal
 life in a way that  
some
  animals
 are  
endangered
.  
Some
  people
 may believe that it is more  
important
 to  
use
 the  
land
 for  
human
  needs
 like farms,  
houses
, and factories than for saving  
animals
, while others may disagree. It depends on the lens through which one is looking. From my lens, I  
agree
 with the statement, and I feel this way  
because
 of two reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To  
start
 with, the huge  
increase
 in  
human
 population. With this continuous  
increase
 in  
human
 numbers, for sure there will be  
need
 to more  
land
, farms, or factories to  
satisfay
 the  
need
 of this  
increase
. Any  
need
 that does not  
meet
, could lead to more serious problems. For instant, in Jordan, there are vast number of  
people
, who are living in a  
very
  small
 country. They try to solve this problem by  
increase
 the building  
lengh
,  
makes
 the size of the  
houses
 smaller  
so
 they can utilize the  
land
 more. They even try to build the factories far a way, which by the way  
increase
 the prices of the product due to the high cost of transportation.  
On the other hand
, there is a  
big
  land
  left
 empty  
because
 it is a natural place for  
endangered
  animals
.  
In this case
, the  
humans
 who  
live
 on unhealthy condition are the one who  
need
 saving. From this we can  
see
 that  
land
 is not always available for  
human
 to reserve it for  
animals
 even if they are in  
danger
. 
Secodly
,  
human
 could do both.  
Lets
 say that  
people
 have  
used
 the whole  
land
 for there  
expantion
, why not build a  
big
  bulding
 with several floors that imitate the natural habitat for these  
endangered
  animals
 or  
move
 these  
animals
 to empty spot far a way from needed  
land
 and  
fix
 it to  
meet
 the  
animal
  needs
.  
For example
, when I came here  
to USA
, I was  
amaized
 by the Zoo, when I visited it  
before
 a year. It is a  
big
 place that contain what  
animal
 could  
need
. In the same  
patern
,  
human
 can create a building, or far a way  
land
, and  
equibs
 it with the  
servival
 tools that could  
help
 the  
endangered
  animals
. It might be win-win situation, which the  
human
 could utilize the  
land
 he needed, and the  
animals
 stay safe. This  
shows
 that it is not necessary that if  
human
  use
 the  
land
 for his  
needs
, this would harm  
endangered
  animal
. There are always other solutions.
To sum up,  
use
 the  
land
 for  
human
  needs
 could have it cons,  
but
 using these  
lands
 by  
human
 may  
safe
 him, and  
also
 it could  
be done
 without harming the  
endangered
  animals
.