First and foremost, it seems unlikely that everyone will stop reading newspapers and books in their physical form. This is because many people enjoy the benefits of reading a real newspaper or book such as the ability to highlight important information or the feeling of turning a page. For instance, many students find that it is imperative to purchase a paper copy of their learning materials so that they can annotate and colour code crucial details. Even though certain people will switch to digital-only books or newspapers in the coming decades, there will still be a significant part of society who will use hard copies.
Another important issue with the proposed idea is that not all content will be freely available online. It is clear to see that many newspaper articles have already been placed behind a paywall and the vast majority of ebooks are sold for similar prices to their paper equivalents. The New York Times, The Economist and Kindle books are three well-known examples of paid digital content and it seems unlikely that they will ever change such a successful business model. It is true that certain organisations and authors may choose to make their content free by focusing on advertising revenue, despite this it seems clear that people will need to pay to access valuable information in the future.
To sum up, despite the increasing trend towards digital media, I strongly disagree with both the idea that physical newspapers and books will no longer be bought by individuals and the reason given that all information online will be available for free.
First
and foremost, it seems unlikely that everyone will
stop
reading
newspapers
and
books
in their physical form. This is
because
many
people
enjoy the benefits of reading a real
newspaper
or
book
such as the ability to highlight
important
information or the feeling of turning a page.
For instance
,
many
students find that it is imperative to
purchase
a paper copy of their learning materials
so
that they can annotate and
colour
code crucial
details
.
Even though
certain
people
will switch to digital-
only
books
or
newspapers
in the coming decades, there will
still
be a significant part of society who will
use
hard
copies.
Another
important
issue with the proposed
idea
is that not all content will be
freely
available online. It is
clear
to
see
that
many
newspaper
articles have already
been placed
behind a paywall and the vast majority of
ebooks
are sold
for similar prices to their paper equivalents. The New York Times, The Economist and Kindle
books
are three well-known examples of paid digital content and it seems unlikely that they will ever
change
such a successful business model. It is true that certain
organisations
and authors may choose to
make
their content free by focusing on advertising revenue, despite this it seems
clear
that
people
will need to pay to access valuable information in the future.
To sum up, despite the increasing trend towards digital media, I
strongly
disagree with both the
idea
that physical
newspapers
and
books
will no longer be
bought
by individuals and the reason
given
that all information online will be available for free.