With the exponential increase in the development of science and technology, people are becoming less creative, social and friendly. Resultantly, some individuals give more priority to artists in this day and age in order to lead a socio-cultural life and hold the traditional values. I nonetheless deem that people should not give more importance to arts over technology.
In this contemporary era, artistic activities- such as dancing, singing, painting, writing, to name but a few are considered valuable skills in that these activities help individuals to work with others in the community. This results in creating strong bonding through regular communications and cooperation. To put it simply, artists no only show their creativity and hold cultural heritage but also help to build a cooperative society. To cite an example, Japanese people give special honour to all artists of their nation, for they believe that they lead a less robotic life these days only because of high-quality dramas, songs and so on.
Plausible though it may seem that artists should be given more preference for building a united and cultural community, never can they contribute to the economic development. To be more precise, without state-of-the-art technology it is next to impossible for a country to compete in the dog-eat-dog global market. Admittedly, artistic activity is essential for entertainment but it cannot help to lead n epicurean and sumptuous life. To exemplify, an empirical study conducted by Cambridge University reveals that countries that were not given value to technology are far behind in the world and are more dependent on the developed nations.
In essence, much as artists and their works facilitate building a united socio-friendly state, people should give more importance to technology in order to survive and win in the cutthroat world.
With the exponential increase in the development of science and
technology
,
people
are becoming less creative, social and friendly.
Resultantly
,
some
individuals
give
more priority to
artists
in this day and age in order to lead a
socio-cultural
life and hold the traditional values. I nonetheless deem that
people
should not
give
more importance to arts over technology.
In this contemporary era, artistic activities- such as dancing, singing, painting, writing, to name
but
a few
are considered
valuable
skills
in that these activities
help
individuals to work with others in the community. This results in creating strong bonding through regular communications and cooperation. To put it
simply
,
artists
no
only
show
their creativity and hold cultural heritage
but
also
help
to build a cooperative society. To cite an example, Japanese
people
give
special
honour
to all
artists
of their nation, for they believe that they lead a less robotic life these days
only
because
of high-quality dramas, songs and
so
on.
Plausible though it may seem that
artists
should be
given
more preference for building a united and cultural community, never can they contribute to the economic development. To be more precise, without state-of-the-art
technology
it is
next
to impossible for a country to compete in the dog-eat-dog global market.
Admittedly
, artistic activity is essential for entertainment
but
it cannot
help
to lead n epicurean and sumptuous life. To exemplify, an empirical study conducted by Cambridge University reveals that countries that were not
given
value to
technology
are far behind in the world and are more dependent on the developed nations.
In essence, much as
artists
and their works facilitate building a united
socio-friendly
state,
people
should
give
more importance to
technology
in order to survive and win in the cutthroat world.