Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion v.1

Museums have been existent until this moment, buta number of people claim them as unnecessary, especially in the technology–dominated world with the prevalence of computers. Others, however, still realize their undeniable merits and insist on their survival. I strongly agree with the latter view. It is undeniable that the internet is creeping ubiquitously into our world in most areas of life, even in the domain of the past. Museums are believed to have little say when people just stay at home, surf the net, and the entire world of quintessence unfolds before their very eyes without physical movements to the museum nearby and payment for this service as well. However, can people really discern the greatness of a civilization without their glance at real objects and direct touch on them? Images on the internet are useful to provide us quick information, yet by no means can they reproduce the real world of the old days via the machine–like window. Only by visiting museums of different countries around the world can modern-day people perceive deeply the glory of the yesterdays and learn to appreciate what ancestors sacrificed for our today’s sustenance. In other sense, the internet serves as a means to arouse people’s curiosity to rush to museums, rather than thwart the existence of these places. Not until visitors have opportunities to journey themselves through websites do they have the urge to explore a beautiful destination, touch, and contemplate themselves among flows of extraordinary things right there in museums, as there goes a saying “seeing is believing”. The internet is now also leveraged as an effective tool to color our museums, surprisingly. To facilitate people’s journey through varied timelines in the large museums where they can get lost easily, the tool of searching for information and categorizing functions available at these places are beneficial. To many historians and researchers, the internet is, too, regarded as a reservoir for them to dig deeper into the histories of a variety of nations worldwide to collect enough data and refer a host of sources for their studies in a relentless effort to recreate the histories, say, wars, to the original state, by dint of which a touch of reality is added to museums and makes it more appealing to visitors. At the same time, it is the usage of other cutting edge innovations, along with the support of the internet that experts can restore myths of the long-forgotten past, for instance, mummification, and give a sense of adventure to children. In other words, museums and the internet are complementary to each other to enrich our world. In the final analysis, no matter how advanced the internet grows, museums are right there, and they can coexist to shed more light on the past to satisfy the inherent curiosity of humankind.
Museums
have been existent until this moment,
buta
number of
people
claim them as unnecessary,
especially
in the technology–dominated
world
with the prevalence of computers. Others,
however
,
still
realize their undeniable merits and insist on their survival. I
strongly
agree
with the latter view.

It is undeniable that the internet is creeping
ubiquitously
into our
world
in most areas of life, even in the domain of the past.
Museums
are believed
to have
little
say when
people
just
stay at home, surf the net, and the entire
world
of quintessence unfolds
before
their
very
eyes without physical movements to the
museum
nearby and payment for this service
as well
.
However
, can
people
really
discern the greatness of a civilization without their glance at real objects and direct touch on them? Images on the internet are useful to provide us quick information,
yet
by no means can they reproduce the real
world
of the
old
days via the machine–like window.
Only
by visiting
museums
of
different
countries around the
world
can modern-day
people
perceive
deeply
the glory of the yesterdays and learn to appreciate what ancestors sacrificed for our
today
’s sustenance. In
other
sense, the internet serves as a means to arouse
people’s
curiosity to rush to
museums
,
rather
than thwart the existence of these places. Not until visitors have opportunities to journey themselves through websites do they have the urge to explore a
beautiful
destination, touch, and contemplate themselves among flows of extraordinary things right there in
museums
, as there goes a saying “seeing is believing”.

The internet is
now
also
leveraged as an effective tool to color our
museums
,
surprisingly
. To facilitate
people’s
journey through varied timelines in the large
museums
where they can
get
lost
easily
, the tool of searching for information and categorizing functions available at these places are beneficial. To
many
historians and researchers, the internet is, too, regarded as a reservoir for them to dig deeper into the histories of a variety of nations worldwide to collect
enough
data and refer a host of sources for their studies in a relentless effort to recreate the histories, say, wars, to the original state, by dint of which a touch of reality is
added
to
museums
and
makes
it more appealing to visitors. At the same time, it is the usage of
other
cutting edge innovations, along with the support of the internet that experts can restore myths of the long-forgotten past,
for instance
, mummification, and give a sense of adventure to children. In
other
words,
museums
and the internet are complementary to each
other
to enrich our world.

In the final analysis, no matter how advanced the internet grows,
museums
are right there, and they can coexist to shed more light on the past to satisfy the inherent curiosity of humankind.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people claim that museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by computer. with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
465 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts