Nowadays, countries are advocating citizens to protect environment in a number of aspects. For example, governments encourage individuals recycling. However, some individuals make a statement that few waste recycled from homes. They reckon that the only approach to rise recycling is to suggest governments to reinforce residences from law. I strongly disagree with this point of view also in this essay I will explain why with some examples.
No one can deny that the aim of the process is to protect surroundings through the recycling. Yet, countries have no rights to force individuals to increase recycling also it will result in a number of disadvantages. To start with, this may cause the chaos to the society by individuals who may paradise on the street to argue that the phenomenon of recycling is unnecessary to arise in wealthy families also they concern about the sanitation with recycling. For example, plastic bags find difficult to disinfect by using second times and therefore individuals will get illness. Thus, individuals will less use any wastes for recycling. Consequently, laws may not force citizens recycling due to the fact that it will trigger the controversy also it will cause illness to the people without completely clean up.
However, governments go through the law to supervise people protecting environment by recycling which brings a variety of benefits to the society. It will decrease a large numbers of containers in the street by people littered. Therefore, ecological system will be improved in a large extent. What I mean is that governments make a legal requirement for regulating recycling and thus citizens can not leave containers as waste. Consequently, less of wastes will exist.
In conclusion, although put recycling into the law will decrease waste and improve ecosystem, I personally believe that government can not force people recycling due to the fact that it will cause dispute in confusion also recycling is not completely secure for individuals.
Nowadays, countries are advocating citizens to protect environment in a number of aspects.
For example
,
governments
encourage
individuals
recycling
.
However
,
some
individuals
make
a statement that few
waste
recycled from homes. They reckon that the
only
approach to rise
recycling
is to suggest
governments
to reinforce residences from
law
. I
strongly
disagree with this point of view
also
in this essay I will
explain
why with
some
examples.
No one can deny that the aim of the process is to protect surroundings through the
recycling
.
Yet
, countries have no rights to force
individuals
to increase
recycling
also
it will result in a number of disadvantages. To
start
with, this may cause the chaos to the society by
individuals
who may paradise on the street to argue that the phenomenon of
recycling
is unnecessary to arise in wealthy families
also
they concern about the sanitation with
recycling
.
For example
, plastic bags find difficult to disinfect by using second times and
therefore
individuals
will
get
illness.
Thus
,
individuals
will less
use
any
wastes
for
recycling
.
Consequently
,
laws
may not force citizens
recycling
due to the fact that it will trigger the controversy
also
it will cause illness to the
people
without completely clean up.
However
,
governments
go through the
law
to supervise
people
protecting environment by
recycling
which brings a variety of benefits to the society. It will decrease a large
numbers
of containers in the street by
people
littered.
Therefore
, ecological system will be
improved
in a large extent. What I mean is that
governments
make
a legal requirement for regulating
recycling
and
thus
citizens can not
leave
containers as
waste
.
Consequently
, less of
wastes
will exist.
In conclusion
, although put
recycling
into the
law
will decrease
waste
and
improve
ecosystem, I
personally
believe that
government
can not force
people
recycling
due to the fact that it will cause dispute in confusion
also
recycling
is not completely secure for
individuals
.