Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.6

Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. v. 6
It is true that animals are used for research in a variety of seating, including tests to determine the safety of drugs, cosmetics and other substances. Although reasons can be given to justify this view, I personally believe that these experiments should be banned because it is ethically unacceptable. There are several reasons why some people support using the animal in the medical research and other product testing. Firstly, the human is the important being on the planet, so everything should be done to ensure human safety and survival. Animal testing enables scientists and researchers to test the safety of medication and other substance with which humans have regular contacts. Drugs, for instance, may pose significant harm to humans, so testing them on animals first give researchers good chance to determine drug safety before human trials are performed. Secondly, researchers aim to minimise the suffering that animals experience in experiments by giving painkiller and anaesthetic drugs. However, I would strongly agree with those who believe that animal experiments should be banned. Animal right activists (who defend animal right) argue that the lives of animals should be respected. The benefits of research using animals do not justify the suffering caused and the ethical debate against animals testing. Also, there are alternative non-animals, methods of testing. For instance, computerised human - patient simulators and In vitro testing, which is defined as a research using human cells and tissue can be used instead of using animals. In conclusion, there are some convincing arguments for and against animal testing, but I strongly believe that we as humans have no moral right to do experiments on animals and we should do everything we can to protect them.
It is true that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
in a variety of seating, including
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tests
to determine the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drugs
, cosmetics and other substances. Although reasons can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
to justify this view, I
personally
believe that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
should
be banned
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is
ethically
unacceptable.

There are several reasons why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
support using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
in the medical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
and other product
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
Firstly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
is the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
being on the planet,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
everything should
be done
to ensure
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
and survival.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
enables scientists and researchers to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
of medication and other substance with which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
have regular contacts.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Drugs
,
for instance
, may pose significant harm to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
them on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
first
give researchers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
chance to determine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drug
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
safety
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
trials
are performed
.

Secondly
, researchers aim to
Possible spelling mistake. 'minimise' is British English.
minimise
the suffering that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
experience in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
by giving painkiller and
Possible spelling mistake. 'anaesthetic' is British English.
anaesthetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
drugs
.
However
, I would
strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with those who believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
should
be banned
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
right activists (who defend
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
right) argue that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
should
be respected
. The benefits of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
do not justify the suffering caused and the ethical debate against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
Also
, there are alternative non-animals, methods of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
.
For instance
,
Possible spelling mistake. 'computerised' is British English.
computerised
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
patient simulators and In
Possible spelling mistake found.
vitro
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
, which
is defined
as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
research
using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
cells and tissue can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
instead
of using animals.

In conclusion
, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
convincing arguments for and against
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
I
strongly
believe that we as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
have no moral right to do
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiments
on
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
animals and
we should do everything we can to protect them.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes
Learning another language is not only learning different words for the same things, but learning another way to think about things.
Flora Lewis

IELTS essay Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. v. 6

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
282 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts