The Criminal rate has been increasing worldwide. Some people support the opinion that prisoners should be given an alternative sentence such as community services than behind the bars. I'm in two minds about this matter, because the life sentence generally depends on the crimes that had been committed. In my point of view, the authorities should properly investigate and conclude with the criminal's punishments.
Firstly, there are various crimes done by individuals, in that not every violation need to be put behind bars. The juvenile delinquent may have just slipped up and would have been led astray by someone to do crimes. These people would be benefited from community services because if they have been taken into custody, this could become a chance for them to be hardened criminal and as well as they may also become reoffended. So, the community services like helping the orphanages, working in welfare organizations, foster a shelter animal and so on. These could provide them with a great impact on their lives.
Secondly, there are violent crimes namely, murders, rapes and genocide, these criminals should be given a prison sentence. This is because of prior planning of these crimes and done with their knowledge and desire, and for them, community services won't be an important tool to get rid of these criminal thoughts. Moreover, these wrongdoers should be given legal charges. For example, the known nirbhaya incident which took place in Delhi shook the entire nation, about 8 people including a minor sexually assaulted and slaughtered her in the moving bus. The outcomes which were given by the Supreme Court was not satisfactory to anyone in our country. Even though the rest of them were given execution, the young offender was given bail with a job in some secured place, but there was no assurance for him not to do the crime like this again. Besides being a minor, he was aware of the humiliation.
Finally, the authorities and the government should properly enquire about the crime and propose appropriate files to the high courts. They should appropriately investigate the reason for the crime. If someone is given bail or probation, there should be justice. As a saying, ' good doer should not be given a prison sentence and a lawbreaker should not be left independent'.
In conclusion, even though there exist plenty of crimes, it should be reasonable to interrogate and the results have to be produced. Depending upon the criminal act the prison sentence or community services should be decided because not every crime needs community services.
The
Criminal
rate has been increasing worldwide.
Some
people
support the opinion that prisoners should be
given
an alternative
sentence
such as
community
services
than behind the bars. I'm in two minds about this matter,
because
the life
sentence
generally
depends on the
crimes
that had
been committed
. In my point of view, the authorities should
properly
investigate and conclude with the criminal's punishments.
Firstly
, there are various
crimes
done by individuals, in that not every violation need to
be put
behind bars. The juvenile delinquent may have
just
slipped up and would have
been led
astray by someone to do
crimes
. These
people
would
be benefited
from
community
services
because
if they have
been taken
into custody, this could become a chance for them to
be hardened
criminal
and
as well
as they may
also
become
reoffended
.
So
, the
community
services
like helping the orphanages, working in welfare organizations, foster a shelter animal and
so
on. These could provide them with a great impact on their
lives
.
Secondly
, there are violent
crimes
namely
, murders, rapes and genocide, these
criminals
should be
given
a prison
sentence
. This is
because
of prior planning of these
crimes
and done with their knowledge and desire, and for them,
community
services
won't be an
important
tool to
get
rid of these
criminal
thoughts.
Moreover
, these wrongdoers should be
given
legal charges.
For example
, the known
nirbhaya
incident which took place in Delhi shook the entire nation, about 8
people
including a minor
sexually
assaulted and slaughtered her in the moving bus. The outcomes which were
given
by the Supreme Court was not satisfactory to anyone in our country.
Even though
the rest of them were
given
execution, the young offender was
given
bail with a job in
some
secured place,
but
there was no assurance for him not to do the
crime
like this again.
Besides
being a minor, he was aware of the humiliation.
Finally
, the authorities and the
government
should
properly
enquire
about the
crime
and propose appropriate files to the high courts. They should
appropriately
investigate the reason for the
crime
. If someone is
given
bail or probation, there should be justice. As a saying,
'
good
doer should not be
given
a prison
sentence
and a lawbreaker should not be
left
independent'.
In conclusion
,
even though
there exist
plenty
of
crimes
, it should be reasonable to interrogate and the results
have to
be produced
. Depending upon the
criminal
act the prison
sentence
or
community
services
should
be decided
because
not every
crime
needs
community
services
.