It is widely acknowledged that cigarette smoke leads to certain health issues for both active smokers and passive ones. This essay holds the position of anti-smoking in communal places.
Some people may argue that all humans have rights to pursue their desirable lifestyles as well as take responsibilities for any consequences. It means that they are free to lead their lives in a way that positively facilitates their emotion and sensibility. For example, a person might opt for smoking to reduce stress and to seek comfort when he/she encounters obstacles. Rights are always accompanied by obligations for the outcomes generated from the actions of citizens. It is admitted by many that smoking impairs physical health of both smokers and non-smokers. Regardless of health issues related to smoking habits, smokers are probably not resisting the temptation of cigarettes and continue living with it later.
On the other hand, despite people’s freedom, many advocates support the idea of restricting smoking in public sites for the sake of society. Smoking also, leads to lung cancer for active smokers and for non-smokers it leads to respiratory problems due to the inhalation of smoke fumes. Therefore, patients must bear the medical expenses and long-term treatment for the cases, which could either be cured with considerable effort and money or cause fatal disease for the bearers. Furthermore, if people smoke in public spots, the youngsters are likely to imitate adults’ as it can be regarded as a stylish manner among their peers. It is thus vital to restrict smoking in any collective spaces to prevent harmful effects on humans.
To conclude, although it cannot deny the importance of citizens’ freedom, we should put the whole society’s health in the first place by restricting public smoking as it would cause negative issues to humans.
It is
widely
acknowledged that cigarette smoke leads to certain
health
issues for both active smokers and passive ones. This essay holds the position of anti-smoking in communal places.
Some
people
may argue that all humans have rights to pursue their desirable lifestyles
as well
as take responsibilities for any consequences. It means that they are free to
lead
their
lives
in a way that
positively
facilitates their emotion and sensibility.
For example
, a person might opt for
smoking
to
reduce
stress
and to seek comfort when he/she encounters obstacles. Rights are always accompanied by obligations for the outcomes generated from the actions of citizens. It
is admitted
by
many
that
smoking
impairs physical
health
of both smokers and non-smokers. Regardless of
health
issues related to
smoking
habits, smokers are
probably
not resisting the temptation of cigarettes and continue living with it later.
On the other hand
, despite
people
’s freedom,
many
advocates support the
idea
of restricting
smoking
in public sites for the sake of society.
Smoking
also
, leads to lung cancer for active smokers and for non-smokers it leads to respiratory problems due to the inhalation of smoke fumes.
Therefore
, patients
must
bear the medical expenses and long-term treatment for the cases, which could either
be cured
with considerable effort and money or cause fatal disease for the bearers.
Furthermore
, if
people
smoke in public spots, the youngsters are likely to imitate adults’ as it can
be regarded
as a stylish manner among their peers. It is
thus
vital to restrict
smoking
in any collective spaces to
prevent
harmful effects on humans.
To conclude
, although it cannot deny the importance of citizens’ freedom, we should put the whole society’s
health
in the
first
place by restricting public
smoking
as it would cause
negative
issues to humans.