People have different views about whether women are capable of performing jobs / working in the police force or the army. In my opinion, despite the difference in physical strength and stamina between the two genders, women can play a significant part in these two areas.
The main argument held by some against women serving in the army or becoming a police officer is that it is too demanding for females to qualify. Unlike most normal jobs where men and women are on par with each other, being a soldier or a sergeant requires the applicant to be tough and strong physically and mentally. The work tends to involve a great deal of intensive training, and it can even be dangerous when confronting criminals or hostile forces. Therefore, women, who are generally less sturdy and more fragile, are not the optimal choice for these occupations.
However, I agree with other people who contend that this is a narrow view. The fact is that women can play essential roles as men do in police offices and military camps. There are many jobs in these two fields that do not involve physical encounters. For example, nearly all police departments and armies need office clerks to work with documents and engage psychological consultants to help people out with their stress management. Women show obvious advantages over men for these positions because they are often more careful, receptive, and empathetic. In reality, secretarial work and counseling in armed forces and police stations are indeed dominantly taken on by females, and their contribution is not eclipsed by males’ at all.
In conclusion, even though females may be less advantaged than males in terms of physical ability, the distinctive gender advantage they hold enables them to be competent at the work in troops and police departments.
People
have
different
views about whether
women
are capable of performing jobs / working in the
police
force or the army. In my opinion, despite the difference in physical strength and stamina between the two genders,
women
can play a significant part in these two areas.
The main argument held by
some
against
women
serving in the army or becoming a
police
officer is that it is too demanding for females to qualify. Unlike most normal jobs where
men
and
women
are on par with each other, being a soldier or a sergeant requires the applicant to be tough and strong
physically
and mentally. The
work
tends to involve a great deal of intensive training, and it can even be
dangerous
when confronting criminals or hostile forces.
Therefore
,
women
, who are
generally
less sturdy and more fragile, are not the optimal choice for these occupations.
However
, I
agree
with other
people
who contend that this is a narrow view. The fact is that
women
can play essential roles as
men
do in
police
offices and military camps. There are
many
jobs in these two fields that do not involve physical encounters.
For example
,
nearly
all
police
departments and armies need office clerks to
work
with documents and engage psychological consultants to
help
people
out with their
stress
management.
Women
show
obvious advantages over
men
for these positions
because
they are
often
more careful, receptive, and empathetic. In reality, secretarial
work
and counseling in armed forces and
police
stations are
indeed
dominantly
taken on by females, and their contribution is not eclipsed by males’ at all.
In conclusion
,
even though
females may be less advantaged than males in terms of physical ability, the distinctive gender advantage they hold enables them to be competent at the
work
in troops and
police
departments.