Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people believe that we should save only those animals which beneficial for us . To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that we should save only those animals which beneficial for us. ArBqL

It is an undeniable fact that it is rightly said that plans to protect wildlifr are plans to preserve man. Nowadays many animals are in verge of extinction. Minority of people believe that individuals should only save those animals which are advantageous for them but i disagree with this statement because there are several reasons which i shall discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs. To begin with, the first and the foremost reason is it would effect on the ecological chain. in orders words, animals plays vital role in balancing ecological chain so if any species of animals would be extint then it would harm the ecological chain. for example, There are many species of bat that becoming extinct such bats help the insect population in control. If these species die then insect will increase and distroy crops. So people have nothing to eat. That is why should protect all the animals. Furthermore, wild animals provide us many valueable things such as oil, fur and many more which are useful for human in daily life. For instance, the tusk of elephant which are helpful for making jewellery. Aprat from this zoo plays indispensable role in humans life as it provide new job opportunities as well as it generate revenue for government in form of taxes. To conclude, animals have a direct or indirect relation with human so they can save every animal rather then only useful.

It is an undeniable fact that it is rightly
 said that plans to protect Possible spelling mistake found.wildlife
wildlifr
 are plans to preserve This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualresidentcitizen
man
. Nowadays This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 are in verge of extinction. Minority of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that individuals should This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 save those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 which are advantageous for them This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
Is this the personal pronoun "I"? It is spelled uppercase.I
i
 disagree with this statement This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 there are several reasons which Did you mean "I"?I
i
 shall discuss in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, the first
 and the foremost reason is it would Did you mean "affect"?affect
effect
 on the ecological chain. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterIn
in
 orders words, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 plays vital role in balancing ecological chain This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 if any species of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 would be Possible spelling mistake found.extentextinctextantex tintext int
extint
 then it would harm the ecological chain. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterFor
for
 example, There are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 species of bat that becoming extinct such bats This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 the insect population in control. If these species This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :pass away
die
 then insect will increase and Possible spelling mistake found.destroydis troy
distroy
 crops. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 have nothing to eat. That is
 why should protect all the animals.

Furthermore
, wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 provide us This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
Possible spelling mistake found.valuablevalue able
valueable
 things such as oil, fur and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 more which are useful for human in daily life. For instance
, the tusk of elephant which are helpful for making Possible spelling mistake. 'jewellery' is British English.jewelry
jewellery
. Possible spelling mistake found.ApartSpratPratA pratApr at
Aprat
 from this zoo plays indispensable role in humans life as it provide new job opportunities as well
 as it generate revenue for This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 in form of taxes.

To conclude
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 have a direct or indirect relation with human This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 they can save every You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
rather
Did you mean "than"? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.than
then
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 useful. 