Some people think that free social activities should be a mandatory part of high school programs. While students who take part in these activities may face some unexpected issues, I agree that educators should design required community services for their high school students without any payments.
On the one hand, the most considerable trouble affects students when participating in public activities is the shortage of time. Particularly, they may be less focused on their core lessons in class, even lack leisure time because of spending too much time for community services. Besides, there are obligatory services which do not suit to everyone. For example, working for a charity at mountainous places or suburban areas requires students to have to go far away or teaching sports to younger children at outdoor stadium demands a good health. All of these types of work do not fit to the weak girls or unhealthy students.
On the other hand, attending unpaid public services will bring great benefits to high school students. Firstly, these programs create a positive environment for students to be raised in a holistic way, not only improving their social knowledge but also motivate their perception about the outdoor life. This is really an appropriate method to train them on how to work for the interest of community instead of living only for themselves. Secondly, taking part in public activities such as volunteer campaigns and charity organizations is a highlighted point which makes their resume brilliant. If an applicant who has the same qualification, as well as experiences with other candidates, would like to apply for a scholarship or a competitive job, his past activities for the interest of community may make an outstanding contribution in helping him defeat the others.
To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
Some
people
think
that free social
activities
should be a mandatory part of high school programs. While
students
who
take part
in these
activities
may face
some
unexpected issues, I
agree
that educators should design required
community
services
for their high school
students
without any payments.
On the one hand, the most considerable trouble affects
students
when participating in public
activities
is the shortage of time.
Particularly
, they may be less focused on their core lessons in
class
, even lack leisure time
because
of spending too much time for
community
services
.
Besides
, there are obligatory
services
which do not suit to everyone.
For example
, working for a charity at mountainous places or suburban areas requires
students
to
have to
go far away or teaching sports to younger children at outdoor stadium demands a
good
health. All of these types of work do not fit to the weak girls or unhealthy students.
On the other hand
, attending unpaid public
services
will bring great benefits to high school
students
.
Firstly
, these programs create a
positive
environment for
students
to
be raised
in a holistic way
, not
only
improving their social knowledge
but
also
motivate their perception about the outdoor life. This is
really
an appropriate method to train them on how to work for the interest of
community
instead
of living
only
for themselves.
Secondly
, taking part in public
activities
such as volunteer campaigns and charity organizations is a highlighted point which
makes
their resume brilliant. If an applicant who has the same qualification,
as well
as experiences with other candidates, would like to apply for a scholarship or a competitive job, his past
activities
for the interest of
community
may
make
an outstanding contribution in helping him defeat the others.
To summarize
, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to
properly
give instructions to
students
and actually works to retard the ability of a
student
to comprehend new lessons.
Therefore
, it is
clear
that the
idea
of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot
be supported
. After thorough analysis on this subject, it
is predicted
that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the
positive
effects, and
because of this
, classroom teachers will never
be substituted
for technology.