Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). v.1
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). v. 1
In the last few years, many new ideas and beliefs arose aiming to improve society and reinforce the relationship between members of a society. One of the proposed ideas, yet under observation, is to make it compulsory for high school students to do some programmes, of course, charity ones, to assist their community.
Firstly, I am completely supporting the idea that: helping promote the society is one of the main duties of a righteous and positive member. Imagine that in the vacation, some youths, and even all ages, work for charitable organisations which help the poor, the sick, the learners and others. Imagine other group cleaning and decorating the streets- of course, that won't affect their dignity- or teaching the young. Indeed that will lead to an extremely modern, civilised and loving community. However, all these are examples, and there are many other ways to improve societies, both charitable and uncharitable methods. Despite this, the idea of compulsory charitable work doesn't sound good for me. I believe that making that compulsory, will not lead to the heroic purpose of the charitable work i. e. the inner desire to help others, but, instead, will make it a type of finishing your work.
I know that this proposed idea aims to teach high school students to be responsible to their society and to take care of others, but I think there is a more efficient method. There are now working groups in many schools in different places which do such charitable work and even without inspiration from the school's administration. So why not make many groups in all schools, and I think that will attract many students.
In conclusion, I think there are other better ways to promote the society without making it compulsory; the sitting compulsory subjects are enough.
In the last few years,
many
new
ideas
and beliefs arose aiming to
improve
society
and reinforce the relationship between members of a
society
. One of the proposed
ideas
,
yet
under observation, is to
make
it
compulsory
for high
school
students to do
some
programmes
,
of course
, charity ones, to assist their community.
Firstly
, I am completely supporting the
idea
that: helping promote the
society
is one of the main duties of a righteous and
positive
member. Imagine that in the vacation,
some
youths, and even all ages,
work
for
charitable
organisations
which
help
the poor, the sick, the learners
and others
. Imagine
other
group cleaning and decorating the streets-
of course
, that won't affect their dignity- or teaching the young.
Indeed
that will lead to an
extremely
modern,
civilised
and loving community.
However
, all these are examples, and there are
many
other
ways to
improve
societies
, both
charitable
and uncharitable methods. Despite this, the
idea
of
compulsory
charitable
work
doesn't sound
good
for me. I believe that making that
compulsory
, will not lead to the heroic purpose of the
charitable
work
i. e.
the inner desire to
help
others,
but
,
instead
, will
make
it a type of finishing your work.
I know that this proposed
idea
aims to teach high
school
students to be responsible to their
society
and to take care of others,
but
I
think
there is a more efficient method. There are
now
working groups in
many
schools
in
different
places which do such
charitable
work
and even without inspiration from the school's administration.
So
why not
make
many
groups in all
schools
, and I
think
that will attract
many
students.
In conclusion
, I
think
there are
other
better ways to promote the
society
without making it
compulsory
; the sitting
compulsory
subjects are
enough
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
32Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes