People have different opinions about whether punishments for different crimes should be fixed, or the circumstances surrounding the offence or the motivation of an offender should be considered. I believe that before deciding on the judgement of a criminal, the factors around his or her crime should be examined.
On one hand, some people believe that all criminals should have a fixed judgement. They believe that if breaking the law has a standard punishment, it would deter criminals from offending and reduce the likelihood of them reoffending. Also, punishing offenders based on a fixed criteria would help prevent manipulation of the law by offenders. For example, regarding the laws concerning speeding on roads has a clear and concise repercussion. This would make it difficult for drivers to successfully lie about their reasons for speeding. Hence, the incidence of road traffic accidents has reduced.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that various factors contribute to crime and these should be taken into account before punishing an offender. For example, a poor father could steal some food to feed his hungry family. In such a case, it would be unfair to pass a fixed judgement, without empathising with his motive. Also, also young be people are usually young and naive they should not be made to serve a jail term like adults would. For instance, when a child is caught abusing illegal drugs, it is better to send the child to a rehabilitating home than prison.
In conclusion, while some people believe that the punishment for all illegal actions should be fixed. It seems to me that the factors and motive of an offender should also be taken into consideration before punishing them.
People
have
different
opinions about whether punishments for
different
crimes should be
fixed
, or the
circumstances surrounding
the
offence
or the motivation of an
offender
should
be considered
. I
believe
that
before
deciding on the judgement of a criminal, the factors around
his or her
crime should
be examined
.
On one hand,
some
people
believe
that all criminals should have a
fixed
judgement. They
believe
that if breaking the law has a standard punishment, it would deter criminals from offending and
reduce
the likelihood of them
reoffending
.
Also
, punishing
offenders
based on a
fixed
criteria
would
help
prevent
manipulation of the law by
offenders
.
For example
, regarding the laws concerning speeding on roads has a
clear
and concise repercussion. This would
make
it difficult for drivers to
successfully
lie about their reasons for speeding.
Hence
, the incidence of road traffic accidents has
reduced
.
On the other hand
, I am of the opinion that various factors contribute to crime and these should
be taken
into account
before
punishing an
offender
.
For example
, a poor father could steal
some
food to feed his hungry family. In such a case, it would be unfair to pass a
fixed
judgement, without
empathising
with his motive.
Also
,
also
young be
people
are
usually
young and naive they should not
be made
to serve a jail term like adults would.
For instance
, when a child
is caught
abusing illegal drugs, it is better to
send
the child to a rehabilitating home than prison.
In conclusion
, while
some
people
believe
that the punishment for all illegal actions should be
fixed
. It seems to me that the factors and motive of an
offender
should
also
be taken
into consideration
before
punishing them.