One of the highly controversial topics nowadays is whether the judiciary system should establish fixed sentences for all crimes, or if it should consider the circumstances and motive behind each crime. This question has been around for ages and since mindsets are rarely the same, therefore, this issue might remain unsolved. In this case, some people believe that it’s better to adopt fixed punishments for each type of crime since it’s more effective, much easier to implement and ensures equality, while others are convinced that it’s better to judge each crime as an individual based on the situation.
Initially, fixed punishments have enormous advantages in achieving effectiveness and justice. Above all, a given set of rules is certainly easier to implement and leads to a more effective process if we compare it with a flexible approach to punish criminals. In other words, fixed punishments will save a lot of time and money that could otherwise be directed for use in much needed services to the community such as health and education since. This is because the judges would not need to determine what type of punishment criminals would deserve as it would have been already decided for them hence, this would definitely make court proceedings a lot quicker. In addition to that, it allows criminals to be treated fairly for their crimes for the reason that it’s important to ensure no one gets discriminated. Also, there will be no differentiation between the criminals who committed the same kind of felony.
Additionally, violation rate would definitely decline. People will be more cautious in their daily activities to prevent any criminal act, because they would already be knowing their fate if they ever commit a crime. Simply put, criminals will think twice before they commit any crime, as they would realize that punishment is going to be swift and strict. One good illustration of this is the declined rate of crimes in some countries that adopt a very strict and harsh punitive system.
On the other hand, a simple principle can’t cover changeable situations. There should be some considerations of what were the motives of crime and also the background of criminals. There must be a different punishment between a serial killer and someone who was forced to kill for self-defending. Applying same punishment to the woman who stole a loaf of bread from a store to feed her hungry baby and a corrupt government employee who stole millions of dollars to pile up his wealth is not at all justified though stealing was the crime in both cases. Moreover, flexible sentences are more equal, compassionate and humane and it would also facilitate the respect of the public for the authority.
To recap, some people believe that fixed punishments are more able to maintain efficiency, equality between criminals much faster and easier than judging people based on the circumstances and motive of each crime. I personally believe that, fixed punishments are undoubtedly necessary to make sure the effective process of the penalty system. Nevertheless, we still have to make room for flexibilities and consider every crime as an individual. 
One of the  
highly
 controversial topics nowadays is whether the judiciary system should establish  
fixed
 sentences for all  
crimes
, or if it should consider the circumstances and motive behind each  
crime
. This question has been around for ages and since mindsets are rarely the same,  
therefore
, this issue might remain unsolved.  
In this case
,  
some
  people
 believe that it’s better to adopt  
fixed
  punishments
 for each type of  
crime
 since it’s more effective, much easier to implement and ensures equality, while others  
are convinced
 that it’s better to judge each  
crime
 as an individual based on the situation. 
Initially
,  
fixed
  punishments
 have enormous advantages in achieving effectiveness and justice.  
Above all
, a  
given
 set of  
rules
 is  
certainly
 easier to implement and leads to a more effective process if we compare it with a flexible approach to punish  
criminals
.  
In other words
,  
fixed
  punishments
 will save  
a lot of
 time and money that could  
otherwise
  be directed
 for  
use
 in  
much needed
 services to the community such as health and education since. This is  
because
 the judges would not need to determine what type of  
punishment
  criminals
 would deserve as it would have been already decided for them  
hence
, this would definitely  
make
 court proceedings a lot quicker.  
In addition
 to that, it  
allows
  criminals
 to  
be treated
  fairly
 for their  
crimes
 for the reason that it’s  
important
 to ensure no one  
gets
 discriminated.  
Also
, there will be no differentiation between the  
criminals
  who
 committed the same kind of felony. 
Additionally
, violation rate would definitely decline.  
People
 will be more cautious in their daily activities to  
prevent
 any  
criminal
 act,  
because
 they would already  
be knowing
 their fate if they ever commit a  
crime
.  
Simply
 put,  
criminals
 will  
think
 twice  
before
 they commit any  
crime
, as they would realize that  
punishment
 is going to be swift and strict. One  
good
 illustration of this is the declined rate of  
crimes
 in  
some
 countries that adopt a  
very
 strict and harsh punitive system. 
On the other hand
, a simple principle can’t cover changeable situations. There should be  
some
 considerations of what were the motives of  
crime
 and  
also
 the background of  
criminals
. There  
must
 be a  
different
  punishment
 between a serial killer and someone  
who
  was forced
 to kill for self-defending. Applying same  
punishment
 to the woman  
who
 stole a loaf of bread from a store to feed her hungry baby and a corrupt  
government
 employee  
who
 stole millions of dollars to pile up his wealth is not at all justified though stealing was the  
crime
 in both cases.  
Moreover
, flexible sentences are more equal, compassionate and humane and it would  
also
 facilitate the respect of the public for the authority.
To recap,  
some
  people
 believe that  
fixed
  punishments
 are more able to maintain efficiency, equality between  
criminals
 much faster and easier than judging  
people
 based on the circumstances and motive of each  
crime
. I  
personally
 believe that,  
fixed
  punishments
 are  
undoubtedly
 necessary to  
make
 sure the effective process of the penalty system.  
Nevertheless
, we  
still
  have to
  make
 room for  
flexibilities
 and consider every  
crime
 as an individual.