Nowadays, in our country's case rate is increasing day by day. Some kind of offence
Is common in all our the world. As an example, in Brazil money heist is very popular. Moreover, in that type of provincial robbery is very common. Many people believed that there should be fixed sanction for each type of case without deciding or analysing the situation. I tend to think that retribution should be based on circumstances of individual actions.
Firstly, I would agree that trial necessary for each breach. In some country like Saudi Arabia there is same suffering for each group of criminals. Furthermore, they do not think about the situation of misconduct. Due to it the lawlessness rate the lowest in this country. In Saudi Arabia person gets fixed torture, whether he steals a Bmw car or an apple. In my point of view, it is better for the government to save their money. Judgment is getting quickly by the jury member. We can also save lots of time. In addition, because of that other small scandal rate are going to decrease. That is happening in the United States.
On the other hand, my argument against the favour of that. I tend to believe that different category of punishment is essential for various crimes. Some case criminal is not guilty, but he is going to punish by the government. Furthermore, some criminal is a mental patient also. We have to think based on the circumstances of that. Because of that innocent does not get punished.
However, such type of crime like murder, sexual harassment for that fixed category punishment is important. That type of violation quick decision is necessary.
To sum up, the criminal should be punished based on the situation and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account. Having said that, fix punishment is significant for such type of crime like rape and others.
Nowadays, in our country's case rate is increasing day by day.
Some
kind of
offence
Is common in all our the world. As an example, in Brazil money heist is
very
popular.
Moreover
, in that
type
of provincial robbery is
very
common.
Many
people
believed that there should be
fixed
sanction for each
type
of case without deciding or
analysing
the situation. I tend to
think
that retribution should
be based
on circumstances of individual actions.
Firstly
, I would
agree
that trial necessary for each breach. In
some
country
like Saudi Arabia there is same suffering for each group of
criminals
.
Furthermore
, they do not
think
about the situation of misconduct. Due to it the lawlessness rate the lowest in this country. In Saudi Arabia person
gets
fixed
torture, whether he steals a
Bmw
car or an apple. In my point of view, it is better for the
government
to save their money. Judgment is getting
quickly
by the jury member. We can
also
save lots of time.
In addition
,
because
of that other
small
scandal rate are going to decrease.
That is
happening in the United States.
On the other hand
, my argument against the
favour
of that. I tend to believe that
different
category of punishment is essential for various crimes.
Some
case
criminal
is not guilty,
but
he is going to punish by the
government
.
Furthermore
,
some
criminal
is a mental patient
also
. We
have to
think
based on the circumstances of that.
Because
of that innocent does not
get
punished.
However
, such
type
of crime like murder, sexual harassment for that
fixed
category punishment is
important
. That
type
of violation quick decision is necessary.
To sum up, the
criminal
should
be punished
based on the situation and the motivation for committing it, should always
be taken
into account. Having said that,
fix
punishment is significant for such
type
of crime like rape
and others
.