People have different views about whether or not punishments for crimes should be fixed. Although there are some advantages of fixed punishments, I would argue that it is better to judge each crime individually.
There are some good arguments for having one punishment for each crime. This system ensures that each member of society knows and understands the consequences of committing any crime. It is a fair system, and it leaves people with no doubt that breaking the law is not tolerated. At the same time, it is much easier for judges and lawyers when there is a clear rule dictating how each offender should be sentenced. For example, if someone is found guilty of stealing, the judge will simply follow the rules and apply the appropriate punishment.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that the context of any criminal act should be taken into account when sentencing an offender. This means that the judge should consider the details of each particular case before deciding on the appropriate punishment. For example, a person who steals something from a shop for the first time should not be treated in the same way as a repeat offender who has been caught shoplifting many times before. It would be sensible to give the first-time offender a small punishment, such as a fine, while the repeat offender may be sent to prison.
In conclusion, it seems to me that a mature and humane legal system would be flexible rather than fixed in terms of how decisions about punishments are made.
People
have
different
views about
whether or not
punishments
for
crimes
should be
fixed
. Although there are
some
advantages of
fixed
punishments
, I would argue that it is better to
judge
each
crime
individually
.
There are
some
good
arguments for having one
punishment
for each
crime
. This system ensures that each member of society knows and understands the consequences of committing any
crime
. It is a
fair
system, and it
leaves
people
with no doubt that breaking the law is not tolerated. At the same time, it is much easier for
judges
and lawyers when there is a
clear
rule
dictating how each
offender
should
be sentenced
.
For example
, if someone
is found
guilty of stealing, the
judge
will
simply
follow the
rules
and apply the appropriate punishment.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that the context of any criminal act should
be taken
into account when sentencing an
offender
. This means that the
judge
should consider the
details
of each particular case
before
deciding on the appropriate
punishment
.
For example
, a person who steals something from a shop for the
first
time should not
be treated
in the same way
as a repeat
offender
who has
been caught
shoplifting
many
times
before
. It would be sensible to give the
first
-time
offender
a
small
punishment
, such as a fine, while the repeat
offender
may be
sent
to prison.
In conclusion
, it seems to me that a mature and humane legal system would be flexible
rather
than
fixed
in terms of how decisions about
punishments
are made
.