In a salad days of millennium, the society is polarised into two groups almost equally regarding to the notion that, many masses think that there should be certain punishment for all crimes, however others believe that for every single crime there should be consider the circumstances and motivation behind it. Different people have their distinct mindset. The following paragraphs would shed light on both the approaches before making the final sheets.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be share in its favour of certain punishments should be given to every victims. First and foremost, fixed punishments offer plethora benefits to judge to decide and give the punishment to the law breakers. As a result, the people will be think twice before committing any crime in their life. Thus, they also realise that the given punishment by court will be strict and hard for them. As an example, the country of Saudi arabia if there are any person stolen the car or apple their both hands will cut down. Secondly, it is especially helps to decline the rates of crime in every country.
Shifting towards to the second school of thought that, under the court perception it is best to decide the plenty for every aspects and condition of crime. Since, many lawbreakers have some life related problems such as paying money for children school fees and many more. Moreover, some people do crime because they are mentally not fit. Consequently, if these kind of masses will be offered by court to take fixed punishments, Uncertainty it is basically and fair practice for some because what actually offender deserve it or what it decided for them.
Hammering the last naiI, I personally believe that there should be equal balance while considering the circumstances behind the each crime and a clear judgement would be given by court to every offender for the rough treatment in the society.
In
a salad days
of millennium, the society is
polarised
into two groups almost
equally
regarding to
the notion that,
many
masses
think
that there should be certain
punishment
for all
crimes
,
however
others believe that for every single
crime
there should be
consider
the circumstances and motivation behind it.
Different
people
have their distinct mindset. The following paragraphs would shed light on both the approaches
before
making the final sheets.
To commence with the
first
notion, there are myriad things to be share in its
favour
of certain
punishments
should be
given
to every
victims
.
First
and foremost,
fixed
punishments
offer plethora benefits to judge to decide and give the
punishment
to the
law breakers
.
As a result
, the
people
will be
think
twice
before
committing any
crime
in their life.
Thus
, they
also
realise
that the
given
punishment
by
court
will be strict and
hard
for them. As an example, the country of
Saudi arabia
if there are any
person
stolen the car or apple their both hands will
cut
down.
Secondly
, it is
especially
helps
to decline the rates of
crime
in every country.
Shifting towards to the second school of
thought
that, under the
court
perception it is best to decide the
plenty
for every
aspects
and condition of
crime
. Since,
many
lawbreakers have
some
life related problems such as paying money for children school fees and
many
more.
Moreover
,
some
people
do
crime
because
they are mentally not fit.
Consequently
, if
these kind
of masses will
be offered
by
court
to take
fixed
punishments
, Uncertainty it is
basically
and
fair
practice for
some
because
what actually offender deserve it or what it decided for them.
Hammering the last
naiI
, I
personally
believe that there should be equal balance while considering the circumstances behind
the each
crime
and a
clear
judgement would be
given
by
court
to every offender for the rough treatment in the society.