Number of people believe that for different types of misdeeds there should be a fixed retribution.
while other says that intentions and cause of committing crime must be preferred before passing
any judgement. There are arguments on both sides which we will discuss here.
On one hand, Fixed punishment will have a deterring effect on society, people will know that they
will be reattributed if they make certain offences which will make society more secure and safe.
However, making judgments regarding intentions of committing crime may not be a fare practice. As
corruption still exist in our society so decision of court may vary from reason for crime.
On other hand, there are number of cases In which imposer commits crime but its intentions are far
away from doing so. For instance a person killing in self defense is not a serial killer, moving from
one victim to next. In my opinion, A intermediate solution is best, which allows convict to keep its
views regarding crime. Many countries regard these intentions as “exception in crime”.
There are number of countries in which Exception in crime is taken in consideration while delivering
a judgement. For example a person found Guilty for theft During feminine. Moreover, killing in self
defense is also exempted from punishment.
So conclusion of both the views are that, criminal laws should be the integral part of our society
while “exception in crime" must typically examined before passing any judgement.
Number of
people
believe that for
different
types of misdeeds there should be a
fixed
retribution.
while
other says that intentions and cause of committing
crime
must
be preferred
before
passing
any
judgement. There are arguments on both sides which we will discuss here.
On one hand,
Fixed
punishment will have a deterring effect on society,
people
will know that they
will
be
reattributed
if they
make
certain
offences
which will
make
society more secure and safe.
However
, making
judgments
regarding intentions of committing
crime
may not be a fare practice. As
corruption
still
exist in our society
so
decision of court may vary from reason for crime.
On other hand, there are number of cases In which imposer commits
crime
but
its intentions are far
away
from doing
so
.
For instance
a person killing in
self defense
is not a serial killer, moving
from
one
victim to
next
. In my opinion, A intermediate solution is best, which
allows
convict to
keep
its
views
regarding
crime
.
Many
countries regard these intentions as “exception in crime”.
There are number of countries in which Exception in
crime
is taken
in consideration while delivering
a
judgement.
For example
a person found
Guilty for
theft During feminine.
Moreover
, killing in self
defense
is
also
exempted from punishment.
So
conclusion of both the views are that, criminal laws should be the integral part of our society
while
“exception in crime
"
must
typically
examined
before
passing any judgement.