How punishments should be inflicted has been a question of contention almost forever. While there are some people who think that punishment should be fixed for a certain type of crime, others say that circumstances and motivation of crimes should be considered. In this essay I will discuss both these views and reach a logical conclusion.
People who say that punishment should be fixed for a type of crime often tend to derive this from the concept of equality of justice. In the light of that view, law should be blind. People who committed a certain type of crime should be punished equally, without compromising the law. And indeed this is beneficial to establish a strong and strict judicial system for any society.
Although punishment should not be discriminated, there are situations that are important to considered. We have to take into account under what circumstance a person committed a crime and what his/her motivation was. Furthermore, the age and psychological conditions of the criminals should be considered. Without considering these we cannot reach a correct and fair decision. For instance, if a someone murders another human being, it is important to know whether the person who was murdered was in any way a threat to the murderer person. If the convict was in a life threatening situation then there is a chance that his act is justified to some extent. Keeping this in mind, it is crucial to consider these things before punishing someone.
From the above argument, it is evident that the nature of the individual crime is essential in determining someone’s punishment. Otherwise the justic would not be complete.
How
punishments
should
be inflicted
has been a question of contention almost forever. While there are
some
people
who
think
that
punishment
should be
fixed
for a certain type of
crime
, others say that circumstances and motivation of
crimes
should
be considered
. In this essay I will discuss both these views and reach a logical conclusion.
People
who
say that
punishment
should be
fixed
for a type of
crime
often
tend to derive this from the concept of equality of justice. In the light of that view, law should be blind.
People
who
committed a certain type of
crime
should
be punished
equally
, without compromising the law. And
indeed
this is beneficial to establish a strong and strict judicial system for any society.
Although
punishment
should not
be discriminated
, there are situations that are
important
to considered. We
have to
take into account under what circumstance a person committed a
crime
and what his/her motivation was.
Furthermore
, the age and psychological conditions of the criminals should
be considered
. Without considering these we cannot reach a correct and
fair
decision.
For instance
, if
a someone
murders another human being, it is
important
to know whether the person
who
was murdered
was in any way a threat to the murderer person. If the convict was in a life threatening situation then there is a chance that his act
is justified
to
some
extent. Keeping this in mind, it is crucial to consider these things
before
punishing someone.
From the above argument, it is evident that the nature of the individual
crime
is essential in determining someone’s
punishment
.
Otherwise
the
justic
would not be complete.
5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
15Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes