Cultivating moral values in children is a daunting task for both mentors and parents. It is often argued by some that teachers are solely responsible for teaching good ethics to children because they spend the most part of their day at school. Meanwhile, others still claim that parents should shoulder this responsibility as children imbibe behaviour from parents. This essay will explore both sides of the argument before reaching a logical opinion.
On the one hand, the supporters of the idea that teachers are responsible for child ethics believe that children usually spend half of the day at school, so this time could be utilized by teacher to nurture good behaviours. Since teachers can bring reform in a child's personality, by keeping an eye on their activities. Take an example of Australia, where a report of research conducted by the Child Behaviour society revealed that the schools are the reason to inculcate daily life ethics in pupils. Thus, to some extent burden lies on mentors to teach morals to students.
While on the other hand, the advocates of the view that parents should teach right and wrong to believe that they act as a role model for them. As at an early age, the brain of a child is not fully developed, so they observe the behaviour of father and mother, which are more likely to be adopted by the child. For instance, the Child Psychiatric Society in the UK has concluded through an experiment that the morals practised by a child are the reflection of parents. Hence, parents should teach morality to children by exercising them at home.
Whereas I believe that children can learn ethic from both teachers and parents. This would for sure results in a child with well-shaped moral and ethical values.
To sum up, from my perspective parents and teachers both play a pivotal role in building ethics in the child because children acquire characters from parents, and spend the major part of the day at school.
Cultivating
moral
values in
children
is a daunting task for both mentors and
parents
. It is
often
argued by
some
that
teachers
are
solely
responsible for teaching
good
ethics to
children
because
they spend the most part of their day at
school
. Meanwhile, others
still
claim that
parents
should shoulder this responsibility as
children
imbibe
behaviour
from
parents
. This essay will explore both sides of the argument
before
reaching a logical opinion.
On the one hand, the supporters of the
idea
that
teachers
are responsible for
child
ethics believe that
children
usually
spend half of the day at
school
,
so
this time could
be utilized
by
teacher
to nurture
good
behaviours
. Since
teachers
can bring reform in a child's personality, by keeping an eye on their activities. Take an example of Australia, where a report of research conducted by the
Child
Behaviour
society revealed that the
schools
are the reason to inculcate daily life ethics in pupils.
Thus
, to
some
extent burden lies on mentors to teach
morals
to students.
While
on the other hand
, the advocates of the view that
parents
should teach right and
wrong
to believe that they act as a role model for them. As at an early age, the brain of a
child
is not
fully
developed,
so
they observe the
behaviour
of father and mother, which are more likely to
be adopted
by the
child
.
For instance
, the
Child
Psychiatric Society in the UK has concluded through an experiment that the
morals
practised
by a
child
are the reflection of
parents
.
Hence
,
parents
should teach morality to
children
by exercising them at home.
Whereas I believe that
children
can learn
ethic
from both
teachers
and
parents
. This would for sure results in a
child
with well-shaped
moral
and ethical values.
To sum up, from my perspective
parents
and
teachers
both play a pivotal role in building ethics in the
child
because
children
acquire characters from
parents
, and spend the major part of the day at
school
.