The population growth, booming economy and rapid urbanization in today's world cause the rise of crime with sophisticated forms of crime and modern weapons. People have different views of whether police should be armed with guns. From my perspective, gun is an indispensable weapon in combating crimes.
On one hand, the widespread use of guns among the police may rise the risk of accidents in crowded places. For instance, police officers who force carries guns can lose control and shoot an unarmed criminal or an innocent person which lead to unexpected casualties. To deal with this problem, instead of using guns, police can use many alternatives such as tear gas, sprays and electric shock weapons. Another solution is to allow only special police units who have to face with armed offenders.
On the other hand, I strongly agree that police should be armed with guns to ensure security for the people. Criminals are becoming increasingly dangerous with modern weapons that require police officers to be well armed. In many cases, shooting is the best choice at the time. For example, police need to use guns when they are attacked by dangerous criminals in self-defense. Furthermore, to prevent dangerous criminals from escaping which may cause threats to the safety of the public, shooting is the most reasonable choice for the police. It cannot be denied that, the threat of a gun can arrest criminals and avoid physical violence. With guns, police officers can force a criminal to surrender quickly, reduce the panic for surrounding people.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that police should be well-equipped with guns due to the increasing level of armed criminals.
The population growth, booming economy and rapid urbanization in
today
's world cause the rise of crime with sophisticated forms of crime and modern
weapons
.
People
have
different
views of whether
police
should be
armed
with
guns
. From my perspective,
gun
is an indispensable
weapon
in combating crimes.
On one hand, the widespread
use
of
guns
among the
police
may rise the
risk
of accidents in crowded places.
For instance
,
police
officers who force carries
guns
can lose control and shoot an unarmed
criminal
or an innocent person which lead to unexpected casualties. To deal with this problem,
instead
of using
guns
,
police
can
use
many
alternatives such as tear gas, sprays and electric shock
weapons
. Another solution is to
allow
only
special
police
units who
have to
face with
armed
offenders.
On the other hand
, I
strongly
agree
that
police
should be
armed
with
guns
to ensure security for the
people
.
Criminals
are becoming
increasingly
dangerous
with modern
weapons
that require
police
officers to be well
armed
. In
many
cases, shooting is the best choice at the time.
For example
,
police
need to
use
guns
when they
are attacked
by
dangerous
criminals
in self-defense.
Furthermore
, to
prevent
dangerous
criminals
from escaping which may cause threats to the safety of the public, shooting is the most reasonable choice for the
police
. It cannot
be denied
that, the threat of a
gun
can arrest
criminals
and avoid physical violence. With
guns
,
police
officers can force a
criminal
to surrender
quickly
,
reduce
the panic for surrounding
people
.
In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that
police
should be well-equipped with
guns
due to the increasing level of
armed
criminals
.