People hold different views in regard to way to tackle environmental pollution. While it is claimed that living simple is the measure for this problem, I would argue that only technological advances can deal with this.
On the one hand, there are some main reasons in support of the view that people merely live simple to handle environmental problems. Firstly, commuters can travel by public transport instead of private vehicles to reduce gas emissions. These emissions probably break down the ozone layer which helps to prevent our exposure to harmful UV rays. Besides, carbon dioxide gases discharged cause greenhouse effects, leading to global warming. Secondly, turning off electrical devices is a good way to save the environment. A significant percentage of electricity in the world comes from non-renewable energy such as fossil fuel and nuclear power. Coal was burned to produce electricity, releasing various emissions such as carbon dioxide or dust. Therefore, turning off electrical appliances when people do not use can cut down the air pollution.
On the other hand, . First, technology can solve the environmental pollution from their origin. Today, people cannot stop energy production or vehicles so it is better to invent machines which treat discard in an environment-friendly way. For instance, an enterprise in Japan filters waste by using a kind of bacteria to decay plastic bottles before disposing to nature. A group of scientists said that this was the solution for saving the environment. Secondly, people only can rely on technological phenomenon to reborn extinct creatures. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in wildlife due to the fact that if a creature disappear, the ecological imbalance will happen. Scientists have been researching to figure out how to maintain biodiversity because humans absolutely cannot live a simple way to recover extinct species.
IN CONCLUSION, a wide range of good grounds for both given views have just been taken into account. As far as I am concerned, I am of the opinion that the idea that technology is an efficient way.
People
hold
different
views in regard to way to tackle environmental pollution. While it
is claimed
that living simple is the measure for this problem, I would argue that
only
technological advances can deal with this.
On the one hand, there are
some
main reasons in support of the view that
people
merely
live
simple to handle environmental problems.
Firstly
, commuters can travel by public transport
instead
of private vehicles to
reduce
gas emissions. These emissions
probably
break down the ozone layer which
helps
to
prevent
our exposure to harmful UV rays.
Besides
, carbon dioxide gases discharged cause greenhouse effects, leading to global warming.
Secondly
, turning off electrical devices is a
good
way to save the environment. A significant percentage of electricity in the world
comes
from non-renewable energy such as fossil fuel and nuclear power. Coal
was burned
to produce electricity, releasing various emissions such as carbon dioxide or dust.
Therefore
, turning off electrical appliances when
people
do not
use
can
cut
down the air pollution.
On the other hand
, .
First
, technology can solve the environmental pollution from their origin.
Today
,
people
cannot
stop
energy production or vehicles
so
it is better to invent machines which treat discard in an environment-friendly way.
For instance
, an enterprise in Japan filters waste by using a kind of bacteria to decay plastic bottles
before
disposing to nature. A group of scientists said that this was the solution for saving the environment.
Secondly
,
people
only
can rely on technological phenomenon to reborn extinct creatures. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in wildlife due to the fact that if a creature disappear, the ecological imbalance will happen. Scientists have been researching to figure out how to maintain biodiversity
because
humans
absolutely
cannot
live
a simple way to recover extinct species.
IN CONCLUSION
, a wide range of
good
grounds for both
given
views have
just
been taken
into account. As far as I
am concerned
, I am of the opinion that the
idea
that technology is an efficient way.