Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos, while others think that zoos are both entertainment and ecological important. v. 14

It is argued that keeping animals in zoos is incorrect or zoos are essential for the wildlife and entertainment of humans. This essay takes a look both sides if this argument and reaches a reasonable conclusion. On the one hand, according to some people zoos have two main negatives. First, zoos are artificial environment; therefore they cause animals losing their wild instinct such as their ability to hunt. It is better to save endangered species by protecting their natural habitats. Second, it is unethical keeping animals in cages. Zookeepers exhibit animal with the aim of profit instead of reservation and he have no right to use animals for entertainment. For instance, 90 percent of species in The Tashkent Zoo are not endangered, but the zoo officials are making quite a huge amount of money from this business. On the other hand, others believe that zoos play an important role in wildlife conservation. Currently large numbers of species are near to become extinct because of the environment changes. If the nature is not suitable for them, animals start to die due to some reasons like not eating enough food. In these situations zoos help that animals to survive by creating a proper atmosphere for them and supply them with food. To give an example 10 amazing creatures might not still here without the conservation of zoos according to the report of “Medium. com”. To sum up, I personally think that zoos are vital to protect animals from extinction, though they have number of minus sides.

It is argued
 that keeping You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in zoos is incorrect or zoos are essential for the wildlife and entertainment of humans. This essay takes a look both sides if this argument and reaches a reasonable conclusion.

On the one hand, according to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 zoos have two main negatives. First
, zoos are artificial environment; therefore
 they cause You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 losing their wild instinct such as their ability to hunt. It is better to save endangered species by protecting their natural habitats. Second, it is unethical keeping You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 in cages. Zookeepers exhibit You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 with the aim of profit instead
 of Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).reservation, and
reservation and
 he The pronoun 'he' is usually used with a third-person or a past tense verb: "has", "had".hashad
have
 no right to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 for entertainment. For instance
, 90 percent of species in The Tashkent Zoo are not endangered, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the zoo officials are making quite a huge amount of money from this business.

On the other hand
, others believe that zoos play an This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 role in wildlife conservation. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Currently,
Currently
 large numbers of species are near to become extinct This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the environment This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :altersadjusts
changes
. If the nature is not suitable for them, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :pass away
die
 due to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 reasons like not eating This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
enough
 food. In these situations zoos This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 to survive by creating a proper atmosphere for them and supply them with food. To give an example 10 amazing creatures might not still
 here without the conservation of zoos according to the report of “Medium. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterCom
com
”.

To sum up, I personally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that zoos are vital to protect You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 from extinction, though they have number of minus sides. 