Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many people believe that having a fix punishment for all crime is more efficient. What are the advantage and disadvantages of having a fix punishment? v.1

Many people believe that having a fix punishment for all crime is more efficient. What are the advantage and disadvantages of having a fix punishment? v. 1
It is considered by some people that giving a fixes punishment for all criminal acts is more effective. There are certain merits and demerits of implementing a fixed punishment for all crimes. There are several positive outcomes of fixed punishment. To begin with, the fixed punishment is productive in the case when someone is influential or wealthy. Without considering the person influence, it is deterrent for people who are influential, as they would come to know that they would get a same punishment, no matter how much money or influence they possess. There are people who may manipulate the court decision, by the use of money, but the presence of a fixed punishment, the decision of the sentencing could not be changed in the court of law. This, in turn, means the criminal offences would reduced, as the results and punishment would remain the same for the rich and the poor. Another beneficial aspect is that fixed punishment for each crime, reduces the crime rate enormously. This is because due to the presence of the stringent policy regarding a punishment for a specific crime, it would be hard for people to think about a crime, as they would be aware of the repercussions of it. This, in turn, means when opting for a crime there would be no thinking about the ease in the punishment policy in the criminal mind. A recent report by the International Criminal Organization, for example, showed that after announcing an exact policy for each crime, results in reducing crime from 60% to 25% in Ireland. However, there are several downsides to this policy. Firstly, it is detrimental for people who opt for a crime or offence in defence. Giving the exact same punishment to a person who attempt a murder while defending himself or family members is disastrous for him. In other words, there are people in society who take an offensive action, owing to safe themselves from getting harm. Research by Oxford University, for instance, showed that 10% death sentences to people in Malaysia, are to those who have murdered someone, in the self-defence. Thus, it results in destroying the life of an individual and his family members. Secondly, teenagers may be affected badly by giving the harsh punishment for their actions, which they have undergone unintentionally. Younger people due to their inexperienced nature, may opt for a crime, which would be done from them, as they would not be able to avoid it, for which they may get punishment. This, in turn, would damage their character and is highly likely to motivate them to further crime. In conclusion, it is argued that a fixed punishment is having productive outcomes. The advantages of this policy are that the influential people would receive the same punishment and reducing the crime, as well as the drawbacks are that it may be disastrous for people who opt for offence in self-protection and teenagers may become highly vulnerable to further crime.
It
is considered
by
some
people
that giving a
fixes
punishment
for all
criminal
acts is more effective. There are certain merits and demerits of implementing a
fixed
punishment
for all crimes.

There are several
positive
outcomes of
fixed
punishment
. To
begin
with, the
fixed
punishment
is productive in the case when someone is influential or wealthy. Without considering the person influence, it is deterrent for
people
who
are influential, as they would
come
to know that they would
get
a same
punishment
, no matter how much money or influence they possess. There are
people
who
may manipulate the court decision, by the
use
of money,
but
the presence of a
fixed
punishment
, the decision of the sentencing could not be
changed
in the court of law. This, in turn, means the
criminal
offences
would
reduced
, as the results and
punishment
would remain the same for the rich and the poor. Another beneficial aspect is that
fixed
punishment
for each
crime
,
reduces
the
crime
rate
enormously
. This is
because
due to the presence of the stringent
policy
regarding a
punishment
for a specific
crime
, it would be
hard
for
people
to
think
about a
crime
, as they would be aware of the repercussions of it. This, in turn, means when opting for a
crime
there would be no thinking about the
ease
in the
punishment
policy
in the
criminal
mind. A recent report by the International
Criminal
Organization,
for example
,
showed
that after announcing an exact
policy
for each
crime
, results in reducing
crime
from 60% to 25% in Ireland.

However
, there are several downsides to this
policy
.
Firstly
, it is detrimental for
people
who
opt for a
crime
or
offence
in
defence
. Giving the exact same
punishment
to a person
who
attempt a murder while defending himself or family members is disastrous for him.
In other words
, there are
people
in society
who
take an offensive action, owing to safe themselves from getting harm. Research by Oxford University,
for instance
,
showed
that 10% death sentences to
people
in Malaysia, are to those
who
have murdered someone, in the
self-defence
.
Thus
, it results in destroying the life of an individual and his family members.
Secondly
,
teenagers
may be
affected
badly
by giving the harsh
punishment
for their actions, which they have undergone
unintentionally
. Younger
people
due to their inexperienced nature, may opt for a
crime
, which would
be done
from them, as they would not be able to avoid it, for which they may
get
punishment
. This, in turn, would damage their character and is
highly
likely to motivate them to
further
crime.

In conclusion
, it
is argued
that a
fixed
punishment
is having productive outcomes. The advantages of this
policy
are that the influential
people
would receive the same
punishment
and reducing the
crime
,
as well
as the drawbacks are that it may be disastrous for
people
who
opt for
offence
in self-protection and
teenagers
may become
highly
vulnerable to
further
crime
.
16Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
58Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes

IELTS essay Many people believe that having a fix punishment for all crime is more efficient. What are the advantage and disadvantages of having a fix punishment? v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
493 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts