People have different views about whether school children under the age of 18 should be given the opportunity to go to school or start their work. While, in some situations, it is more likely to be reasonable for adolescents to leave school early, I believe that having a good educational background would benefit young people in the long term.
There are various reasons why people may argue that young students should start their work as soon as possible. Firstly, due to the high rate of poverty, there are a number of families that can not afford their children to attend a school or even supply enough food. In Vietnam, for example, many children have to delay their schooling to help their parents earn money to pay the cost of living. Secondly, children who have the opportunities to work with people who are experts in particular fields can bring more valuable lessons for young students, which are not taught at school. As a result, when it comes to applying to a position in a company, employers tend to favour applicants who have an experience rather than those who do not.
However, I support the views that education plays a vital role in national development perspective and government should do much more to keep young people in school until the age of 18. Young children who do not have enough knowledge can be exploited in exhausting jobs. Furthermore, if governments allocate a national budget to promote children schooling, they will witness an increase in quality working adults and help to develop their countries. For instance, if government funding in Vietnam had enhanced the quality of life of the poor, children would have not to drop out of school and some of them would have been talented workers serving our world.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for young students to delay their studies, I personally assume governments should support school children financially as well as mentally.
People
have
different
views about whether
school
children
under the age of 18 should be
given
the opportunity to go to
school
or
start
their work. While, in
some
situations, it is more likely to be reasonable for adolescents to
leave
school
early, I believe that having a
good
educational background would benefit
young
people
in the long term.
There are various reasons why
people
may argue that
young
students should
start
their work as
soon
as possible.
Firstly
, due to the high rate of poverty, there are a number of families that can not afford their
children
to attend a
school
or even supply
enough
food. In Vietnam,
for example
,
many
children
have to
delay their schooling to
help
their parents earn money to pay the cost of living.
Secondly
,
children
who
have the opportunities to work with
people
who
are experts
in particular
fields can bring more valuable lessons for
young
students, which are not taught at
school
.
As a result
, when it
comes
to applying to a position in a
company
, employers tend to
favour
applicants
who
have an experience
rather
than those
who
do not.
However
, I support the views that education plays a vital role in national development perspective and
government
should do much more to
keep
young
people
in
school
until the age of 18.
Young
children
who
do not have
enough
knowledge can
be exploited
in exhausting jobs.
Furthermore
, if
governments
allocate a national budget to promote
children
schooling, they will witness an increase in quality working adults and
help
to develop their countries.
For instance
, if
government
funding in Vietnam had enhanced the quality of life of the poor,
children
would have not to drop out of
school
and
some
of them would have
been talented
workers serving our world.
In conclusion
, although it might seem sensible for
young
students to delay their studies, I
personally
assume
governments
should support
school
children
financially
as well
as mentally.