Air travel is causing some problems for the environment, therefore we should increase the price to discourage people. Others disagree that this is the solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Air travel is causing some problems for the environment, therefore we should increase the price to discourage people. Others disagree that this is the solution. 0EoKq
Air travel has some negative effects on the environment, so people have different views about the methods to reduce these problems. While I accept that rising costs are not the best solution to protect the environment, there are many other methods to reduce the negative impact of air travel on the environment.
On the one hand, I think climbing the price is not the method that is effective to restrict the effect of air travel on the environment. Firstly, since people can not travel by plane because of high cost, they will use other transports such as cars or motorbikes which emit a lot of exhaust fumes. This will rapidly cause air pollution and it also takes tolls on humans. Secondly, because there are many people who need to go far to work, they will find it difficult to travel and finish their task if they can not go by plane. For example, when businessmans have to travel foreign countries to seed investments, they will have to cope with many difficulties on travel due to the high cost. As a result, it will exert adverse impacts on the development of the economy in their countries.
On the other hand, I would argue that there are some great solutions to mitigate negative impacts of air travel to the environment. The first solution is that the governments should invest in creating machines for planes to limit the emission of exhaust fumes. Consequently, the level of air pollution will decrease significantly. Additionally, the governments should not have many adverse effects on the environment for purposes of air travel. For instance, if they destroy forests to make way for airports, many wild animals will lose their habitat and humans also are taken some tolls from natural disasters such as blood.
In conclusion, governments should not raise the price of air travel. Instead of that, they should try other methods which are more effective.
Air
travel
has
some
negative
effects on the
environment
,
so
people
have
different
views about the
methods
to
reduce
these problems. While I accept that rising costs are not the best solution to protect the
environment
, there are
many
other
methods
to
reduce
the
negative
impact of
air
travel
on the environment.
On the one hand, I
think
climbing the price is not the
method
that is
effective to restrict the effect of
air
travel
on the
environment
.
Firstly
, since
people
can not
travel
by
plane
because
of high cost, they will
use
other
transports such as cars or motorbikes which emit
a lot of
exhaust fumes. This will
rapidly
cause
air
pollution and it
also
takes tolls on humans.
Secondly
,
because
there are
many
people
who need to go far to work, they will find it difficult to
travel
and finish their task if they can not go by
plane
.
For example
, when businessmans
have to
travel
foreign countries to seed investments, they will
have to
cope with
many
difficulties on
travel
due to the high cost.
As a result
, it will exert adverse impacts on the development of the economy in their countries.
On the
other
hand, I would argue that there are
some
great solutions to mitigate
negative
impacts of
air
travel
to the
environment
. The
first
solution is that the
governments
should invest in creating machines for
planes
to limit the emission of exhaust fumes.
Consequently
, the level of
air
pollution will decrease
significantly
.
Additionally
, the
governments
should not have
many
adverse effects on the
environment
for purposes of
air
travel
.
For instance
, if they
destroy
forests to
make
way for airports,
many
wild animals will lose their habitat and humans
also
are taken
some
tolls from natural disasters such as blood.
In conclusion
,
governments
should not raise the price of
air
travel
.
Instead
of that, they should try
other
methods
which are more effective.