Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that in the near future there will be no borders between countries, while others feel that national borders will always remain. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The discussion whether there will be no borders between countries in the near futures or national borders will always remain raises a thorny question. While some people claim borders will be removed, I believe that there will not be any defference about borders. Every country has own borders for seperating their territory from other neigbour countries` land. According to some people, there will exist any front in a number of decade. They claim that there will be only one country in the world consequently people will be able to go any country over the world without any permisson or another issue and of course there is a reason people to consider like this. They do that because of existing easy visa system between lots of countries and there is a number of country such as Belguim, Netherland and Luxembourg and this countries are called BENELUX countries. As a result there exist lots of unities like this consequently that causes people suppose fronties will destroy. On the other hand, people including me, believe that borders will not be removed. They claim that unities between countries are only political and economic matter nothing else so these help the country to inrease their incomes thanks to tourism and other things. Because If there was not any union in the world, every country would ought to solve their own problem without getting any help from other countries. That is why, in my personal opinion, there need not to decide there will be just a country over the world in the near future. In conclusion, we have paid aattention two different views and discussed both of them and as a result, the possibility of not existing borders does not make sense in the future.
The discussion whether there will be no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
borders
between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in the near futures or national
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
borders
will always remain raises a thorny question. While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
claim
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
borders
will
be removed
, I believe that there will not be any
Possible spelling mistake found.
defference
about borders.

Every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
borders
for
Possible spelling mistake found.
seperating
their territory from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
Possible spelling mistake found.
neigbour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries`
land. According to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, there will exist any front in
Possible agreement error. The noun decade seems to be countable; consider using: “a number of decades”.
a number of decade
. They claim that there will be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
consequently
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will be able to go any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
without any
Possible spelling mistake found.
permisson
or another issue and
of course
there is a reason
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to consider like this. They do that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of existing easy visa system between lots of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
and there is a number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
such as
Possible spelling mistake found.
Belguim
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
Netherland
and Luxembourg and
‘This’ does not seem to match the plural noun ‘countries’. Did you mean “these”?
this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
are called
BENELUX
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
.
“As” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As
a result there exist lots of unities like this
consequently
that causes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
suppose
Possible spelling mistake found.
fronties
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroy
.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
including me, believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
borders
will not
be removed
. They claim that unities between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
political and economic matter nothing else
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
to
Possible spelling mistake found.
inrease
their incomes thanks to tourism and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
things.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
If there was not any union in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
, every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
would ought to solve their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
problem without getting any
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
.
That is
why, in my personal opinion, there need not
Did you mean “decide”?
to decide
there will be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
world
in the near future.

In conclusion
, we have paid
Possible spelling mistake found.
aattention
two
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
views and discussed both of them and
as a result
, the possibility of not existing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
borders
does not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
sense in the future.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that in the near future there will be no borders between countries, while others feel that national borders will always remain.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
289 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts