In this day and age, almost nations over the world have been targeting to the knowledge economy. As a consequence, an increasing number of people are concerned about the phenomenon that whether all students with any financial circumstances should be made it free for formal education. However, I would contend that the merits of this development are outweighed by its drawback.
On the one hand, it seems to confirm the idea that if government bring free-college policy or provision of free-of-charge education into effect, people in all walk of life will be entitled to attend tertiary education. As a result, these policies can contribute considerably to waive the illiteracy in a lot of slums and the impoverished countryside, which is extremely important since the educational level reflects the progression of each country, for instance, many develop countries Japan, USA or Singapore possess cutting-edge technology and high average per capita income due to high academic level. Whereby, the underprivileged students are able to experience a modern environment and get access to job opportunity in the future, which provide more high educated workforce for economy causing the advance in other fields like healthcare and military.
On the other hand, I believe the positive aspects of this trend are eclipsed by more immediate threats to budget’s government due to the substantial loss of tuition fees and educational fund triggers national budget deficit, so this method absolutely inappropriate to the developing countries and the less ones. Moreover, the shortage of budget investing in health service and military areas is also the repercussion of this trend. Secondly, the additional subsidy stimulates the greedy of humans, specifically there are more and more people who are not really destitute and entirely have the capable of paying all of the charge are relying on this policy and this situation depriving the chance of families are worth receiving this welfare.
All in all, this statement are partly true, however, the risk of this trend are significant, therefore, authorities of each nations should distribute the limited budget reasonably and equally to various fields
In this day and age, almost nations over the world have been targeting to the knowledge economy. As a consequence, an increasing number of
people
are concerned
about the phenomenon that whether all students with any financial circumstances should
be made
it free for formal education.
However
, I would contend that the merits of this development
are outweighed
by its drawback.
On the one hand, it seems to confirm the
idea
that if
government
bring free-college policy or provision of free-of-charge education into effect,
people
in all walk of life will
be entitled
to attend tertiary education.
As a result
, these policies can contribute
considerably
to waive the illiteracy in
a lot of
slums and the impoverished countryside, which is
extremely
important
since the educational level reflects the progression of each country,
for instance
,
many
develop countries Japan, USA or Singapore possess cutting-edge technology and high average per capita income due to high academic level. Whereby, the underprivileged students are able to experience a modern environment and
get
access to job opportunity in the future, which provide more high educated workforce for economy causing the advance in other fields like healthcare and military.
On the other hand
, I believe the
positive
aspects of this trend
are eclipsed
by more immediate threats to
budget’s
government
due to the substantial loss of tuition fees and educational fund triggers national
budget
deficit,
so
this method
absolutely
inappropriate to the
developing countries
and the
less
ones.
Moreover
, the shortage of
budget
investing in health service and military areas is
also
the repercussion of this trend.
Secondly
, the additional subsidy stimulates
the greedy of
humans,
specifically
there are more and more
people
who are not
really
destitute and
entirely
have
the capable of
paying
all of the
charge are relying on this policy and this situation depriving the chance of families are worth receiving this welfare.
All in all, this statement are partly true,
however
, the
risk
of this trend are significant,
therefore
, authorities of each
nations
should distribute the limited
budget
reasonably
and
equally
to various fields