It is argued that experiments on animal should be eliminated due to its immorality. Personally, although I agree that testing on animals can be barbaric, in some cases, those experiments are indispensable. Therefore, this essay will take both sides into consideration before my personal stance in the conclusion
On the one hand, there are several merits of animals testing that people should take into account. It is evident that are the most appropriate subjects for the trials of new medicine since the body structures of some mammal are quite similar to human. For example, it has been scientifically proven that rats ’s body has 80% in common with human’s. in addition, experiments on animals are used in some crucial scientific research so that it will help to advance medical and scientific industry. Besides, it is said that the majority of medical breakthroughs or innovations has resulted from animal experiments, which are definitely advantageous for the society.
On the other hand, I believe that the opponents of those tests are literally rational. One of the most obvious reasons for people’s disagreement is that the benefits of research using animals cannot justify the suffering caused on animals because life of those creatures should be respected as human’s. For example, they have no right to keep some rats or rabbits in captivity for testing some lipsticks or foundation, which not only is superfluous but also put animals in a miserable condition and pain. Furthermore, there are some alternative methods to replace animals that business should consider. A perfect illustration can be seen in the cosmetic industry, people produce fake skin resembling human’s skin to test new makeup products such as toners or serums instead of using innocuous creatures.
In conclusion, while animal testing has some undeniable advantages for the society, people should not overlook the detrimental and unethical influence of them on animals and I think that scientists should develop some others ways to substitute those experiments.
It
is argued
that
experiments
on
animal
should
be eliminated
due to its immorality.
Personally
, although I
agree
that
testing
on
animals
can be barbaric, in
some
cases, those
experiments
are indispensable.
Therefore
, this essay will take both sides into consideration
before
my personal stance in the conclusion
On the one hand, there are several merits of
animals
testing
that
people
should take into account. It is evident that are the most appropriate subjects for the trials of new medicine since the body structures of
some
mammal
are quite similar to
human
.
For example
, it has been
scientifically
proven that
rats ’s
body has 80% in common with
human’s
.
in
addition,
experiments
on
animals
are
used
in
some
crucial scientific research
so
that it will
help
to advance medical and scientific industry.
Besides
, it
is said
that the majority of medical breakthroughs or innovations has resulted from
animal
experiments
, which are definitely advantageous for the society.
On the other hand
, I believe that the opponents of those
tests
are
literally
rational. One of the most obvious reasons for
people’s
disagreement is that the benefits of research using
animals
cannot justify the suffering caused on
animals
because
life of those creatures should
be respected
as
human’s
.
For example
, they have no right to
keep
some
rats or rabbits in captivity for
testing
some
lipsticks or foundation, which not
only
is superfluous
but
also
put
animals
in a miserable condition and pain.
Furthermore
, there are
some
alternative methods to replace
animals
that business should consider. A perfect illustration can be
seen
in the cosmetic industry,
people
produce fake skin resembling
human’s
skin to
test
new makeup products such as toners or serums
instead
of using innocuous creatures.
In conclusion
, while
animal
testing
has
some
undeniable advantages for the society,
people
should not overlook the detrimental and unethical influence of them on
animals
and I
think
that scientists should develop
some
others ways to substitute those
experiments
.