Some people believe that Government should not spent money on preserving artifacts and museum that our culture, but father focus on promoting and enchanting public services such as transportation, water supply, electricity supply etc. Do you agree or disagree with the opinion?
Some people believe that Government should not spent money on preserving artifacts and museum that our culture, but father focus on promoting and enchanting public services such as transportation, water supply, electricity supply etc. with the opinion? LbM7p
It is considerad that Government not spent sufficiently money for protecting artifacts and museum that shows our culture. In the contrary, attention on more provide promoting and enchancing public services. As an instance to that, transportation, satar supply, electricity supply and other services. In this essay, I will examine this situation. Absolutely, disagree and I am support this my opinion with examples. First of all, human's activity of keeping priority than other things because of that most important forgeting, artifacts and these products displaying in the museum. In fact, öne of the part in our life both artifacts and another arts. Thats why, I think better preserving these areas and spent more money. Consequently, I think the governments adequate spent money. Moreover, these areas and artifacts essentially reflect of our culture, our history and at the same time lead to our future. For reason, necessary attention shows goverment. Secondly main reason, artifacts and museum most important areas for education. Thus, children entertainment learn of art. Some of, gradually develop and the best will be artificer in the future countries need to art for develop. This situation, relate most leader say sentence. For instance, Turkis big leader Mustafa Kemal Atatürk said " One of the nation stayed far away arts like break off one vein". That's why I think government should not spend money on preserving artifacts and museum, and this situation must be changed. In conclusion same give attention both promoting and enchancing public services and artifacts.
It is
considerad
that
Government
not spent
sufficiently
money
for protecting
artifacts
and
museum
that
shows
our culture. In the contrary, attention on more provide promoting and
enchancing
public services. As an instance to that, transportation,
satar
supply, electricity supply and other services. In this essay, I will examine this situation.
Absolutely
,
disagree and
I am support this my opinion with examples.
First of all
, human's activity of keeping priority than other things
because
of that most
important
forgeting
,
artifacts
and these products displaying in the
museum
. In fact,
öne
of the part in our life both
artifacts
and another
arts
.
Thats
why, I
think
better preserving these areas and spent more
money
.
Consequently
, I
think
the
governments
adequate spent
money
.
Moreover
, these areas and
artifacts
essentially
reflect of our culture, our history and at the same time lead to our future. For reason, necessary attention
shows
goverment
.
Secondly
main reason,
artifacts
and
museum
most
important
areas for education.
Thus
, children entertainment learn of
art
.
Some
of,
gradually
develop and the best will be artificer in the future countries need to
art
for develop. This situation, relate most leader say sentence.
For instance
,
Turkis
big
leader Mustafa
Kemal
Atatürk
said
"
One of the nation stayed far away
arts
like break off one vein
"
. That's why I
think
government
should not spend
money
on preserving
artifacts
and
museum
, and this situation
must
be
changed
.
In conclusion
same give attention both promoting and
enchancing
public services and
artifacts
.