Some people believe that courses of performing arts (e.g. dance, music, drama, etc.), should be funded by government. Others believe that these should be funded through other ways (e.g. businesses or student’s family). Discuss both views and give your opinion.

A group of commentators are of this approach that holding and attending in artistry performance classes namely music, theater, or dance ought to be financially supported by government, whereas the other cohorts are against it and assert that this funding should be applied on enthusiasts via different sources such as related corporations or even their families. Both approaches are debated in the following in detail, together with my own personal view is outlined. On the one hand, it is commonly held by some authorities and it is accepted by their followers that flourishing courses of art branches which encompassing performing skills have to be expedited by governments’ funds. First and foremost, it results in easier circumstances of enrollment for attendees by using allocated subsidies. As a matter of fact, all individuals in the society would participate in these courses with a same amount of opportunity if they took advantage of various subsidies for instance national grants in these contexts. However, it seems this statement provides a place of inequality for more susceptible people. It means, for example, the more talented people are, the more accessibility to artistic courses may have – the thing which sounds does not matter with this attitude. On the other hand, it is considered by some other commentators that supporting visual arts ought to be occurred by different diversified sources such as businesses or pupil’s parents themselves. Initially, governments can allocate specific amount of funds to commercial sectors involving arts and culture, rather than invest on citizens directly. In this way, a better filtration will be done and opportunities will find real talents. Moreover, by providing predetermined pensions or grants for families, they can decide themselves how to utilize these bonuses for their children in right times and right places. In other words, school children will be able to start they acting careers since childhood if their parent rules permit them to follow such after-school classes properly. To conclude, keeping both mentioned views of government-based and miscellaneous assistance for acting art courses valuable, my firm conviction is that the former is of more importance. In fact, investing on potential artists would be smarter and more effective in this way.