In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of public attention due to its substantial impacts on human life. Although this idea of coexistence between climate change and humans appears plausible, we should find out other practical approaches to combat climate change instead of accepting it in the long run.
There are a number of reasons why some inclines to the idea of coexisting with climate change. First, since the impacts of climate change is significant, we are not strong enough to resist the laws of nature. For example, Japan annually suffers from earthquakes, or some of the Asian coastal countries always annually worry about the typhoon shaped by their geographic locations, thus combating climate change is in vain. Second, by harnessing the proliferation of technology or erecting solid buildings, supporters suggest that living with clime change is straightforward. For example, cutting-edge technology has allowed people to minimize the most detrimental impacts of severe disasters, saving millions of lives.
Nevertheless, there are a number of reasons why the coexistence can do more harm than good. First, since climate change is largely shaped by human activities rather than nature itself, humans should take responsibility for that. This means exhaust fumes from vehicles and gas emissions from factories contribute to leaving a sheer volume of carbon footprint in the air, which in turn intensifies global warming. In addition, if climate change is inevitably exacerbated, it causes more big losses. For example, humans will suffer more from severe storms, massive destructions, or even species extinction, which is irreversible, leaving humans at stake
In conclusion, the hypothesis of living with climate change should be rejected. By actively combating natural disasters and making the environment friendlier, people can live sustainable in their own ecosystem.
In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of public attention due to its substantial impacts on
human
life. Although this
idea
of coexistence between
climate
change
and
humans
appears plausible, we should find out other practical approaches to combat
climate
change
instead
of accepting it in the long run.
There are a number of reasons why
some
inclines to the
idea
of coexisting with
climate
change
.
First
, since the impacts of
climate
change
is significant, we are not strong
enough
to resist the laws of nature.
For example
, Japan
annually
suffers from earthquakes, or
some
of the Asian coastal countries always
annually
worry about the typhoon shaped by their geographic locations,
thus
combating
climate
change
is in vain. Second, by harnessing the proliferation of technology or erecting solid buildings, supporters suggest that living with clime
change
is straightforward.
For example
, cutting-edge technology has
allowed
people
to minimize the most detrimental impacts of severe disasters, saving millions of
lives
.
Nevertheless
, there are a number of reasons why the coexistence can do more harm than
good
.
First
, since
climate
change
is
largely
shaped by
human
activities
rather
than nature itself,
humans
should take responsibility for that. This means exhaust fumes from vehicles and gas emissions from factories contribute to leaving a sheer volume of carbon footprint in the air, which in turn intensifies global warming.
In addition
, if
climate
change
is
inevitably
exacerbated, it causes more
big
losses.
For example
,
humans
will suffer more from severe storms, massive
destructions
, or even species extinction, which is irreversible, leaving
humans
at
stake
In conclusion
, the hypothesis of living with
climate
change
should
be rejected
. By
actively
combating natural disasters and making the environment friendlier,
people
can
live
sustainable in their
own
ecosystem.