Some people argue that children ought to be taught cooperation at school while others oppose the idea and tend to believe that rivalry ought to be taught. I personally corroborate the assertion that competition has much more effect on children’s studies, and it is much more beneficial for their future lives.
On the one hand, it is claimed that collaboration helps children to make good relationships with their friends, and it plays an increasingly pivotal role in their studies as well. Who is able to collaborate with his groupmates and schoolmates, that person can be much more successful in his studies because they can help and teach each other. At that time, lessons seem more attractive and interesting to them. In the end, they are becoming more enthusiastic and responsible for their lesson. Moreover, collaboration has effects on their future lives, while they are working because each of them will grow up as a person who is able to collaborate. In the end, they would be able to work with others and share their place with them.
On the other hand, I agree that cooperation does more good than harm in children’s lives due to several facts. First of all, because of cooperation, students, who are reluctant to study, start to work hard in order to be able to compete with his or her groupmates in a good way. Moreover, this is a way that makes lessons much more enjoyable and effective. Additionally, with the help of cooperation, all children become more social and active. Not only during their childhood but also being able to cooperate will help them in their adult years. For instance, they will fight tooth and nail in order to become in their careers such us competing with other companies.
In conclusion, although these two opposing viewpoints both have merit, while there is some truth to the argument that collaboration helps to be able to share and work together, there is also a need to understand that cooperation makes a person much more successful and competitive.
Some
people
argue that
children
ought to
be taught
cooperation
at school while others oppose the
idea
and tend to believe that rivalry ought to
be taught
. I
personally
corroborate the assertion that competition has
much
more effect on
children’s
studies
, and it is
much
more beneficial for their future
lives
.
On the one hand, it
is claimed
that collaboration
helps
children
to
make
good
relationships with their friends, and it plays an
increasingly
pivotal role in their
studies
as well
. Who is
able
to collaborate with his
groupmates
and schoolmates, that person can be
much
more successful in his
studies
because
they can
help
and teach each
other
. At that time, lessons seem more attractive and interesting to them. In the
end
, they are becoming more enthusiastic and responsible for their lesson.
Moreover
, collaboration has effects on their future
lives
, while they are working
because
each of them will grow up as a person who is
able
to collaborate. In the
end
, they would be
able
to work with others and share their place with them.
On the
other
hand, I
agree
that
cooperation
does more
good
than harm in
children’s
lives
due to several facts.
First of all
,
because
of
cooperation
, students, who are reluctant to
study
,
start
to work
hard
in order to be
able
to compete with
his or her
groupmates
in a
good
way.
Moreover
, this is a way that
makes
lessons
much
more enjoyable and effective.
Additionally
, with the
help
of
cooperation
, all
children
become more social and active. Not
only
during their childhood
but
also
being
able
to cooperate will
help
them in their adult years.
For instance
, they will fight tooth and nail in order to become in their careers such us competing with
other
companies
.
In conclusion
, although these two opposing viewpoints both have merit, while there is
some
truth to the argument that collaboration
helps
to be
able
to share and work together, there is
also
a need to understand that
cooperation
makes
a person
much
more successful and competitive.