Nowadays, many organizations help people who are in need. Some people support the view that charity should be distributed to the ones who needs the help most. While others opine that organization should assist people who live in their nation. Both sentiments are essential for people. I personally believe that citizens should get more benefit from their country's organization. The following paragraphs will elaborate both the views.
On the one hand, if charity would be contributed around the globe, the relation between countries would be flourish. In other words, if one country will support another Nation in critical time, eventually they will get help in future if it is required. Because of that, other nation will get influence as well and consequently no one will back off to support and will stand with each other. This would resolve problems who actually requires. To give an example of Australia's forest fire, more than ten countries donated money in different ways and resolved problem somehow.
On the other hand, if organization will nurture their own county's citizens who needs help, it will bring more equality between inhabitants. In other words, little help from country would give incentive to work harder and eventually it would bring economic equalities and consequently the disparity would decrease. Other point to take into consideration is it will stop citizens to do unpleasant work. Resent survey found that where the support from organization is more, the ratio of unpleasant work is less in country.
To conclude, both statements are prominent in their own ways. However, taking care of their natives would certainly be beneficial for nation as well as citizens.
Nowadays,
many
organizations
help
people
who
are in need.
Some
people
support
the view that charity should
be distributed
to the ones
who
needs
the
help
most.
While
others opine that
organization
should assist
people
who
live
in their
nation
. Both sentiments are essential for
people
. I
personally
believe that
citizens
should
get
more benefit from their country's
organization
. The following paragraphs will elaborate both the views.
On the one hand, if charity would
be contributed
around the globe, the relation between
countries
would be
flourish
. In
other
words, if one
country
will
support
another
Nation
in critical time,
eventually
they will
get
help
in future if it
is required
.
Because
of that,
other
nation
will
get
influence
as well
and
consequently
no one will back off to
support
and will stand with each
other
. This would resolve problems
who
actually requires. To give an example of Australia's forest fire, more than ten
countries
donated money in
different
ways and resolved problem somehow.
On the
other
hand, if
organization
will nurture their
own
county's
citizens
who
needs
help
, it will bring more equality between inhabitants. In
other
words,
little
help
from
country
would give incentive to work harder and
eventually
it would bring economic
equalities
and
consequently
the disparity would decrease.
Other
point to take into consideration is it will
stop
citizens
to do unpleasant work. Resent survey found that where the
support
from
organization
is more, the ratio of unpleasant work is less in country.
To conclude
, both statements are prominent in their
own
ways.
However
, taking care of their natives would
certainly
be beneficial for
nation
as well
as
citizens
.