There are many people who question the existence of zoos in the 21st of century. In their opinion, keeping animals in captivity is unethical. While I do agree with this view, I do not think that zoos should be abolished.
In spite of all the arguments against the existence of zoos, the truth is that they still benefit both humans and animals. Zoos provide education. They give us an opportunity to observe wild animals from close quarters and learn about their behavior. Another very important benefit of maintaining zoos is that they save many endangered species from extinction. Zoos provide them with a safe environment where they can live and reproduce. Without zoos many exotic species of animals would have disappeared from earth.
The argument against the existence of zoos stems from the fact that they ill-treat animals. That is true to a certain extent. In many zoos, animals are kept in small enclosures where they cannot even move about. Such zoos exist with the sole purpose of making money by exploiting animals. In my opinion, such establishments should be closed down as we have no right to use or exploit other forms of life for our benefit.
Having said that, there are also zoos that allow animals to live in protected environments that are closer to the wilderness. Animals living in such zoos do enjoy some amount of freedom. They might even be able to hunt small animals that the zoo authorities throw into their ‘territories’. Life in such zoos actually benefits these animals because they are safe from poachers who might otherwise have killed them for their skin, teeth or tusks.
To conclude, when we consider the benefits of zoos, it is not hard to see that the argument against their existence does not hold water. Zoos do protect animals. Instead of abolishing them, what we need to do is to make them more animal friendly.
There are
many
people
who question the
existence
of zoos in the 21st of century. In their opinion, keeping
animals
in captivity is unethical. While I do
agree
with this view, I do not
think
that zoos should
be abolished
.
In spite of
all the arguments against the
existence
of zoos, the truth is that they
still
benefit
both humans and
animals
. Zoos provide education. They give us an opportunity to observe wild
animals
from close quarters and learn about their behavior. Another
very
important
benefit
of maintaining zoos is that they save
many
endangered species from extinction. Zoos provide them with a safe environment where they can
live
and reproduce. Without zoos
many
exotic species of
animals
would have disappeared from earth.
The argument against the
existence
of zoos stems from the fact that they ill-treat
animals
.
That is
true to a certain extent. In
many
zoos,
animals
are
kept
in
small
enclosures where they cannot even
move
about. Such zoos exist with the sole purpose of making money by exploiting
animals
. In my opinion, such establishments should
be closed
down as we have no right to
use
or exploit other forms of life for our benefit.
Having said that, there are
also
zoos that
allow
animals
to
live
in protected environments that are closer to the wilderness.
Animals
living in such zoos do enjoy
some
amount of freedom. They might even be able to hunt
small
animals
that the zoo authorities throw into their ‘territories’. Life in such zoos actually
benefits
these
animals
because
they are safe from poachers who might
otherwise
have killed them for their skin, teeth or tusks.
To conclude
, when we consider the
benefits
of zoos, it is not
hard
to
see
that the argument against their
existence
does not hold water. Zoos do protect
animals
.
Instead
of abolishing them, what we need to do is to
make
them more
animal
friendly.