Allowing children to choose daily personal options, some people are afraid of rising selfishness in children`s personality. What is vital to keep in mind is giving them a chance to select the food or clothes, can result in building up more responsible characters in the future.
Over the times, stable upbringing has been a controversial issue world wide. Referring to the idea of respecting children`s right, it is supported by some experts not limiting them and just let them to face whether the consequence of their choice is appropriate. This action is stated with two justifications that the first one is the feeling of being independent and stop blaming others for the outcomes. Also, expanding their minds to becoming ready for making more significant decisions in future is explained as the second reason.
The contrary views of mentioned notion describe that even personal matters, when they are allowed daily, can lead the offspring to know their comfort as the most important subject to be considered in the whole life. Furthermore, take child who has spoiled by satisfactory situation and never forced to eat the food that detests as an example, this person will not be open to give up some of its benefits to respect others rights, even in terms of consuming less fuel to save the environment. Therefore, teaching the children about the priority of criteria is much more valuable than unlimited range of choices.
In conclusion, as mentioned before, it is vital to let children choosing their favorite types of games and nutrients to intake that makes them more responsible in future; however, there is a limitation for it and parents should try to show them how to make suitable decisions.
Allowing
children
to choose daily personal options,
some
people
are afraid of rising selfishness in
children`s
personality. What is vital to
keep
in mind is giving them a chance to select the food or clothes, can result in building up more responsible characters in the future.
Over the times, stable upbringing has been a controversial issue
world wide
. Referring to the
idea
of respecting
children`s
right, it
is supported
by
some
experts not limiting them and
just
let
them to face whether the consequence of their choice is appropriate. This action
is stated
with two justifications that the
first
one is the feeling of being independent and
stop
blaming others for the outcomes.
Also
, expanding their minds to becoming ready for making more significant decisions in future is
explained
as the second reason.
The contrary views of mentioned notion
describe
that even personal matters, when they are
allowed
daily, can lead the offspring to know their comfort as the most
important
subject to
be considered
in the whole life.
Furthermore
, take child who has spoiled by satisfactory situation and never forced to eat the food that detests as an example, this person will not be open to give up
some
of its benefits to respect others rights, even in terms of consuming less fuel to save the environment.
Therefore
, teaching the
children
about the priority of criteria is much more valuable than unlimited range of choices.
In conclusion
, as mentioned
before
, it is vital to
let
children
choosing their favorite types of games and nutrients to intake that
makes
them more responsible
in future
;
however
, there is a limitation for it and parents should try to
show
them how to
make
suitable decisions.