Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people argue that public should be allowed to have guns others do not agree,Discuss both view.

Some people argue that public should be allowed to have guns others do not agree, 1a2Py
Any type of violence are not acceptable in our society. some human agree with weapons are allowed for self defence and other said weapons are not acceptable. I discuss both view in following paragraph. In a begin with, If we allocated mass with gun it increases in offences like murderer thieves for instance, some ruler area local with guns obtain Robbery and rob the travellers. Secondly it increases sucide rate in society. one can shoot own to little things like if weapon holder have some kind sadness or depression he can shoot anytime themselves. One the other hand, So many masses utilised their weapon for self defences as in our country we are attache with three international border we have always fear for attacks by them. if terrorist will comes and try to make them prisoners they can save their and others life. lastly, Huge countryside area surrounded by wild animals So if they have weapons they can save their dear and near one’s life to doing some firing in air. So both have negative and positive impact but demerit is overweigh than merit. So government should be strict rules against keep gun. so innocent human are not to be a victim on such crime.
Any type of violence are not acceptable in our society.
some
human
agree
with
weapons
are
allowed
for
self defence
and other said
weapons
are not acceptable. I discuss both view in following paragraph. In a
begin
with, If we allocated mass with gun it increases in
offences
like murderer thieves
for instance
,
some
ruler area local with guns obtain Robbery and rob the
travellers
.
Secondly
it increases
sucide
rate in society.
one
can shoot
own
to
little
things like if
weapon
holder have
some
kind sadness or depression he can shoot anytime themselves.
One
the other hand,
So
many
masses
utilised
their
weapon
for
self defences
as in our country we are
attache
with three international
border
we have always
fear
for attacks by them.
if
terrorist will
comes
and try to
make
them prisoners they can save their
and others
life.
lastly
, Huge countryside area surrounded by wild animals
So
if they have
weapons
they can save their dear and near one’s life to doing
some
firing in air.
So
both have
negative
and
positive
impact
but
demerit is
overweigh
than merit.
So
government
should be strict
rules
against
keep
gun.
so
innocent human are not to be a victim on such crime.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people argue that public should be allowed to have guns others do not agree,

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
205 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts